If Jikes is in your system path then the patch to Jikes is not needed in server.xml (otherwise it is of course). If you say to use Jikes, the the inline compiler is not used (and everything goes a lot quicker). JSP compilation and EJB deployment is about 10-15 times faster with Jikes. "Su, Yi" wrote: > Hi, Jeroen, > > Thank you very much. > This does clarify a lot on my understanding. Another question that I'm > having is, since tools.jar contains the inline Java compiler, what should I > do if I want to specify jikes as my compiler. I notice that in server.xml > there is an option, but it doesn't tell the path of jikes (or should I > specify the full path of jikes for the "compiler executable"?). How does it > affect the inline compiler? (I thought the server always use javac as > default compiler, inline compiler is really new to me, thanks) > > Regards, > Su Yi > > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Wenting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 2:39 PM > To: Su, Yi > Subject: RE: JSP on Win98 > > I don't know if it's a bug. Under NT, placing it in the main folder also > works, and this is the location stated in the documentation. If it works in > the lib folder (as it should, I think) this is probably coincidence. > tools.jar is of course not really an add-on library like a JDBC driver or > XML parser, but rather an application that is called by the JSP engine (it > contains the inline Java compiler to compile JSPs into classfiles). > > Jeroen T. Wenting > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Murphy was wrong, things that can't go wrong will anyway > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Su, Yi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 08:30 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: JSP on Win98 > > > > > > Hi, Jeroen, > > > > Ya, I've put the tools.jar in the lib folder under orion. It didn't work. > > However I follow your suggestion to put the tools.jar in the main orion > > folder, it works. > > This is strange, isn't it? In Windows NT, the tools.jar goes to > > lib folder > > under orion, do you have an idea that why Windows98 has a different > > requirement? Besides, the library path in the application.xml states > > <library path="../lib" />. Is this a bug? > > Anyway, thanks a lot for your help. > > > > Regards, > > Su Yi > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: J.T. Wenting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 2:06 PM > > To: Su, Yi; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: JSP on Win98 > > > > > > have you copies tools.jar to the main orion folder? The error > > seems to be an > > IE 'friendly HTTP error message'. You can turn those of (and the > > server-generated messages on ) from tools->options->advanced in IE. > > > > Jeroen T. Wenting > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Murphy was wrong, things that can't go wrong will anyway > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Su, Yi > > > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 06:06 > > > To: Orion-Interest > > > Subject: JSP on Win98 > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've tried Orion examples on Windows NT 4 and Windows 2000 > > > server. They are > > > all OK. But I couldn't get through in Win98 machine. The problem is > > > whenever a page refers to a JSP page, a "Page not found" will > > be throwed. > > > Could anyone please help me out? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Su Yi > > >
begin:vcard n:Smith;Dave tel;cell:+44 797 0008867 tel;work:+44 1225 445610 x-mozilla-html:FALSE adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:Dave Smith end:vcard