Maybe the list administrator should unsubscribe that email address...


----- Original Message -----
From: "Edoardo Comar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 5:24 AM
Subject: sending to this list always produces an error mail


> Hi
>
> sending to this mailing list always produces an error mail like the one
> shown below.
> I have tried to contact the postmaster mentioned in the error mail, but he
> doesn't exist ....
>
> Edo
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 23 February 2001 10:13
> > To: Edoardo Comar
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Your message concerning RE: please tell me : does JMS work at
> > all ?
> >
> >
> >
> > The person you have tried to contact is no longer employed at Netch
> > Technologies.  You may wish to contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, or
> > visit us on the web, http://www.netch.se/ .
> >
> > This message is probably caused by one of the following recipient
> > adresses:
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > If you feel this message is in error, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
> > get in touch with the mail administrator.
> >
> > regards,
> > /netch/
> >
> > The original message follows:
> >
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Feb 23 11:12:55
> > 2001Received: from ernst-hugo.netch.se
> > (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.16.2.10])
> > by atwood.netch.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04056
> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:12:55 +0100
> > Received: from druid.evermind.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [195.58.126.196])
> > by ernst-hugo.netch.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA31261;
> > Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:12:55 +0100
> > Received: from druid.evermind.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [195.58.126.196])
> > by druid.evermind.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA13166;
> > Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:49:01 -0100
> > Received: from maps.knowledgeview.co.uk (maps.knowledgeview.co.uk
> > [193.114.95.2])
> > by paladin.evermind.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06179
> > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001
> > 12:37:54 -0500
> > Received: from edo ([193.114.95.145]) by
> >           maps.knowledgeview.co.uk (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with
> >           SMTP id G97EQG00.45D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri,
> >           23 Feb 2001 09:37:28 +0000
> > From: "Edoardo Comar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: RE: please tell me : does JMS work at all ?
> > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:41:48 -0000
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> > X-Mailer: Orion ListServer
> > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
> > Importance: Normal
> > Reply-To: Orion-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Pey Yen.
> >
> > I don't understand how it can work for you, especially without editing
> > jms.xml.
> > I can avoid creating new connection factories, but I can't avoid
declaring
> > my destinations !!!
> >
> > If I do NOT edit jms.xml , I get
> > Error looking up objects: Error reading application-client descriptor:
No
> > location set for Topic resource jms/theTopic
> >
> > If I add a location=jms/theTopic attribute to
> > orion-application-client.xml I
> > get :
> > Error looking up objects: Error reading application-client
> > descriptor: Error
> > creating context: jms/theTopic not found
> >
> > regardless of the location attribute, if I add the jms/theTopic
> > to jms.xml,
> > then the lookup works (as expected) but I get :
> > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
> >         at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeUTF(DataOutputStream.java:329)
> >         at java.io.DataOutputStream.writeUTF(DataOutputStream.java:306)
> >         at com.evermind.server.jms.ck.<init>(JAX)
> >         at com.evermind.server.jms.b9.start(JAX)
> >         at JMSChat.run(JMSChat.java:61)
> >         at JMSChat.main(JMSChat.java:29)
> >
> > So I maintain tha JMS does not work at all. I have tried to use
> > weblogic and
> > my jms code works like a breeze.
> >
> > cheers
> > Edo
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chia, Pei
Yen
> > > Sent: 23 February 2001 03:28
> > > To: Orion-Interest
> > > Subject: RE: please tell me : does JMS work at all ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >   The chat example works. You have to activate the JMS service in
> > > /config/server.xml file (uncomment <jms-config path="./jms.xml" /> ).
> > >
> > >   Don't modify anything from the original jms.xml. Then do the steps
as
> > > documented at "jmsdemo-readme.txt". It should be able to work.
> > >
> > >   I encountered the same problem at connection.start() when i tried to
> > > include
> > > <topic-connection-factory host=<hostaddr>
> > > location="jms/theTopicConnectionFactory" port="9127" />
> > > at my jms.xml file.
> > >
> > >   I believe the chat example makes reference to the
> > jndi.properties file.
> > >
> > >   I hope this helps.
> > >
> > >   I'm still trying to figure out why connection.start() fails as
> > > i'm trying
> > > to write a MEssageDrivenBean that needs to register the TopicFactory
and
> > > Topic for other clients to subscribe to. Still not successful yet. Any
> > > pointers, anybody?
> > >
> > > Pei Yen
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edoardo
Comar
> > > Sent: 23 February 2001 02:47
> > > To: Orion-Interest
> > > Subject: please tell me : does JMS work at all ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Please, can anyone confirm that (as of 1.4.7) JMS does not work at all
?
> > >
> > > See my previous messages for details ... basically a
connection.start()
> > > throws an NPE
> > > and a send doesn't work if the connection is not started
> > (contrary to the
> > > spec which requires start() to be called for message delivery).
> > >
> > > Edo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to