RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out

[Alex Paransky]

Title: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out

I read the spec, and still saw the Dependent Objects in there.  Where does it say that the DOs are gone?

 

-AP_

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Russ White
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:53 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out

Am I the only one that think the following makes more sense?

 

EJBObject -> Local interface

RemoteEJBObject -> Remote interface

 

as opposed to

 

EJBObject -> Remote interface

EJBLocalObject -> Local interface

 

Isn't is the more natural state for an object to be local?

 

I am glad the whole DO thing is gone. It made no good sense at all.

 

Just my 2C

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Drury
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:14 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: ejb 2.0 proposed final draft #2 is out

Here is the section that says what is different between
PFD 1 and 2:

E.12 Proposed Final Draft 2
Introduced local interfaces and local home interfaces for entity beans and session beans.
Added characterization of local client view.
Added subclasses of EJBException for systems exceptions thrown from local interface methods.
Revisions to architecture for container managed persistence:
* Shifted container managed relationships among entity beans from remote interfaces to local
interfaces.
* Removed dependent object classes.
* Removed remote relationships among entity beans.