Title: SV: Common classes between ejb.jar & web.war

So WL doesnt let your web-app freely access classes in your ejb module?

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Dvornikov Victor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Skickat: den 7 juni 2001 05:52
> Till: Orion-Interest
> Ämne: RE: Common classes between ejb.jar & web.war
>
>
> The workable solution is to copy the shared classes to ejb
> directory and to
> web one. I works perfectly.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Magnus Rydin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent:       ??? ????? 07 ???? 2001 09:42
> > To: Orion-Interest
> > Subject:    SV: Common classes between ejb.jar & web.war
> >
> > Is WL happy with just including the helper .jar:s in the
> .ear, or does it
> > require it to be part of an ejb jar in order for it to be
> found by the cl
> > ?
> >
> > WR
> >
> > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > Fran: Andre Vanha [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > > Skickat: den 4 maj 2001 14:06
> > > Till: Orion-Interest
> > > Amne: RE: Common classes between ejb.jar & web.war
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe the ejb-jar file is the correct place.  I believe
> > > in orion, as in
> > > weblogic, the ejb classloader is the parent of each web app
> > > classloader,
> > > making classes packaged in you ejb jar available to all web
> > > apps (within the
> > > application).  You could also package your classes in a seperate
> > > jar/directory and point to it from orion-application.xml
> > > (application-deployments/%AppName%) using a <lib> tag.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps,
> > >
> > > Andre
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From:       Lou Farho [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > > > Sent:       Friday, May 04, 2001 12:30 PM
> > > > To: Orion-Interest
> > > > Subject:    Common classes between ejb.jar & web.war
> > > >
> > > > Where should one put classes that are shared between their
> > > ejbs and their
> > > > web interface?
> > > > Do you create a jar file and put it in the ear? Put in
> > > orion's lib dir?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Lou Farho
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to