I just finished doing some load testing with Orion, WebLogic, and WebSphere
(via IBM Apache).
All the servers but WebSphere/Apache eventually had connection failures. I
chalk it up to all the object creation/destruction going on for a connection.
Apache, having it's C heritage does not have as much overhead this way.
My guess is that I could put any of the servers behind Apache and not have the
connection failures. The question is, does adding the infrastructure and
support for Apache in your environment make sence? Connection failures don't
become an issue until you reach a certain level (different for each server &
load type). Do you need to worry about it?
BTW, Orion did the best when it came to throughput and connection failures.
Enjoy,
Bob
From: "Tony Fonager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@orionserver.com on 06/13/2001 09:10 AM
ZE2
Please respond to "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: "A connection with the server could not be established" error ...
this has nothing to do with "show friendly http error messages" - they are
not enabled in my browser.
the problem is, i dont even get a connection to Orion - the same result, as
if you enter an www adress in your browser, which doesnt exist.
and this is just temporary - very temporary - normally a push on the reload
button, gets a new connection.
if I sit and press "reload" hundreds of times, suddently the server stops
returning the dummy page, and after a seconds or so, it beginds to return a
result again.
wierd, ehhh ?
Regards,
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: elephantwalker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12. juni 2001 22:07
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: "A connection with the server could not be established"
error ...
Tony,
ie is a little flakey with its 'friendly' messages. Try using ns to see what
the exact error is, or turn-off the 'friendly' messages from ie.
regards,
the elephantwalker
