Stephen Goranson writes: > In Qumran scrolls, there are indeed claims about who is > the true Judah (those who observe the law in the house of Judah), who the Where is there any notion of a difference between a 'true' Judah and a 'false' Judah, as opposed to a single Judah which is located somewhere on a map with people living there? Where do you see a textual sign that the doers of the law in Judah considered themselves the exclusive Judah-ites resident in Judah? Or that 'Judah' in the Qumran texts is functioning any differently than in its biblical uses (where there is no notion of a 'true' versus 'false' Judah)? Are you getting this view from a Qumran text, or from some other source, such as secondary scholarship? i.e. what is the source of your thinking on this? Greg Doudna For private reply, e-mail to "Greg Doudna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: "unsubscribe Orion." Archives are on the Orion Web site, http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il.