On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:06 +0100, Beat Forster wrote: > I'm happy to hear that it isn't a performance > issue. If it is the following strategy is > possible: If DeleteSyncSet is called, you know > that all items will be deleted, so delete them > and return 20030 and keep the number of deleted > items. After that, DeleteItem will be called for > the number of items. Just return ok for all of > them and give the engine a chance to count them.
That should indeed work. > The engine has all information about the number > of deleted elements. Probably these deleted items > are currently not counted in case of > refresh-from-server. > I think this can be fixed. This sounds like a fairly easy fix - except that I don't know where to look ;-) Can someone give me a pointer or perhaps implement the fix right away? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
