This README is getting more and more generic - perhaps we should take
out .ia64 and the Intel(R) SR870BH2 tag?

Also, shouldn't this README be kept consistent with the documentation?

Cheers,

Bernard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:45
> To: Bernard Li; OSCAR-DEVEL
> Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and 
> elilo problems
> 
> From: Bernard Li;  Monday, December 13, 2004 3:57 PM
> >
> >Hey Fernando:
> >
> >Looks good, I just got 2 questions:
> >
> >1) mysql-server
> >   ------------
> >
> >You will need to obtain a mysql-server rpm and put it into
> /tftpboot/rpm
> >before starting the OSCAR Wizard. The easiest way is to get the SRPM
> and
> >rebuild,
> >
> >    rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-1.src.rpm
> >    cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql-server-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
> >/tftpboot/rpm
> >
> >If you can't get that SRPM, make sure you also save the other RPMS,
> e.g.,
> >
> >    rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-2.3.src.rpm
> >    cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql*-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
> /tftpboot/rpm
> >
> >- I am not sure what you mean in the second part...  how come the
> src.rpm
> >file versions are different?  Are you saying that the top one is the 
> >recommended version and if you can't find that specific version make
> sure
> >that the other support RPM files are included in 
> /tftpboot/rpm as well?
> >But how come the version #s are different in the second part
> (3.23.58-2.3
> >first line vs 3.23.58-1 second line).
> 
> I wrote that bit.  So, the version provided by RH is 
> 3.23.58-1.  If you go the Internet, you might find, say, 
> 3.23.58-2.3.  This is fine if and only if you also build the 
> other mysql rpms.  That is, you can't mix the 
> mysql-3.23.58-1.arch.rpm w/ mysql-server-3.23.58-2.3.arch.rpm.
> 
> So, should the second sentence say:
> 
>   If you can't get the 3.23.58-1 source rpm, you must save all the
>   RPMs when you build the mysql-server, that is, all mysql versions
>   must be consistent.  For example, you could do
> 
> Is this better?  If not, can you suggest some changes?
> 
> --
> David N. Lombard
>  
> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to