From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David N. Lombard
Sent: Thu 24/02/2005 8:43 PM
To: Thomas Naughton
Cc: Lombard, David N; Oscar-devel List
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] Qt or not Qt
Thomas Naughton wrote:
> ... Well, one
windowing
> package would be easier to maintain than two, which ever we
choose. ;)
That's the whole point. We have a bunch of incomplete Qt
bits, two
functioning Qt apps, and the rest, that is well tested and now
much
improved, is Tk.
I'd be arguing for Qt if it was the other way
round.
Work was done on a Qt replacement because that's what the people
doing
the work wanted to do. At this point, we have some unknown amount
of
work to get this new stuff going at all, let alone to the
reliability
the current code has. Finally, no matter what, all the SIS
bits are Tk
and going to stay that way.
At the end of the day, the
only way to get to a single gui toolkit is to
drop Qt.
--
David N.
Lombard
Rossmoor, Orange County, CA
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/uncgi/Earth?imgsize=320&opt=-z&lat=33.8&ns=North&lon=118.08&ew=West&alt=7&img=learth.evif
-------------------------------------------------------
SF
email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews
on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly
live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel
mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
