From: David Isaacson on Monday, July 11, 2005 12:09 PM > > Hey guys, > > I'm back from the weekend, I tried reinstalling on the new nodes using > the *other* ethernet port, and I no longer receive destination host > unreachable errors. (Although it still calls the port "eth0").
Which port is "... the port 'eth0'?" Is that the other (unconnected?) port or the one you're now using? FWIW, SystemConfigurator will choose the first device on the bus (see lspci) as eth0--this can sometimes not be your preference. > I haven't really done any testing yet, but I was able to finish all of > the steps without further error. I'll keep you posted. OK > Now I just have to figure out why xfs is hogging a whole CPU on the > nodes... See <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=1210675&gr oup_id=9368> -- dnl My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
