Hi Erich: On 10/2/07, Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The second (and more major) issue: The metaRPMs built by opkgc contain no > requires at all! It is fine that they contain only a spec file, but it seems > to be wrong. > > > rpm -q --requires -p opkg-sis-server-1:3.8.0-3.noarch.rpm > /bin/sh > /bin/sh > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 I partially fixed this issue: http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/changeset/6235 opkgc needs to be rebuilt and all the opkg-<package> RPMs will also need to be rebuilt and uploaded to gforge. However, this only fixes the dependency issue partially as opkg-<package>-client/server still do not require opkg-<package> -- I think they should, right? This requires more poking around with the opkgc code, unless Jean can fix this. Also, another issue related to dependencies is that currently the opkg meta packages have a dependency on 'oscar-base-server' -- I could only guess that this is supposed to be the RPM generated from the oscar-base tarball (which contains all the /opt/oscar stuff). This RPM/spec currently does not exist -- do we plan to create this any time soon? If not, then perhaps we should remove it from the RPM spec file template for opkgc. Cheers, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
