Well ... of course i am kindof annoyed but not upset. I just put in question that
those people asking and putting it into importance what they need something
the usual answer is that the they are not able to change something. But they can
do something to help their wishes come true. So i just suggest to start (in this
particular case) with a kind of fond for resources (time, ability and money) and
everyone who sees value in it contributes. Its just fair treatment and maybe
the fastest way to reach the target.

yours
Martin.

2006/8/26, erixtekila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry for the question, but: "... it has great perspective for who
> can." ... which perspektives?
>
> Lets point it out from the view of this certain developer: You need to
> study eclipse API so
> in the endeffect you know the eclipse API better afterwards (+), but
> that takes time (-). He will
> get a application to code faster, which is good for the person (+) but
> also good for any other
> developer in flash(++ VS -). But you need to distribute it (and even
> worse: write documentation) (-)
> No other one (as with the example of ASDT and HXDT) will contribute
> something, which tends to
> be flash-alike, so you are forced to encurage the development es well.
>
> So from the view of this developer it would take a bunch less work and
> a lot more afford if he just writes
> it by himself for himself, unless there is some community that is able
> to support his work (by documentation,
> handling bug reports, creating tutorials, what so ever). So what great
> perspective are you talking about.
>
> I have heard a lot of times "I want to support that" but the common
> and usual praxis is that this
> wont happen. In the end the developer who programmed this gets out
> with a minus and just because people
> think programming it once is the only problem.
>
> In order to make someone doing it I suggest to make(if youre really
> willing to get it) a fond of Money (real life value)
> that is kept for people that can contribute code to this project and
> can be given to them when they made something
> outstanding. And make some community deal to handle things like (as
> mentioned before) documentation that is
> compulsive to that people that confirm to help.
>
> Its kinda hard point of view but only having "hey do it for the
> community" is just not a very big opportunity, especially for this
> kind of topic.
Hey, Martin.

I know your opensource efforts.
When speaking of "perspectives", I was talking from a development point
of view.
Of course not budget one !

I too have participated to opensource developments.
I too can feel that lots of people say they'll contribute and never do.
But don't feel annoyed (like I thnk you are), because I knew this fact
before.

Sorry if I get you upset, btw. My thread wasn't meant to do it at all.

Looking at the great opensource flash related projects, I find
nevertheless that an IDE to create flash content is definitively a
need.
To conclude, let's keep the thread on topic more than the pros and cons
of opensource software.

Thanks and excuse if any offence.
Greetings.
-----------
erixtekila
http://blog.v-i-a.net/

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
osflash@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org



--
ICQ: 117662935
Skype: mastakaneda
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
osflash@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to