Oh, you know that. I have _got_ to stop answering before reading entire emails. ;)
Scott On 04/05/07, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Google will give you more space if you ask you know. > > Scott > > On 04/05/07, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure hosting at OSFlash.org is really a big issue IMHO. I mean, > > I've already pointed plenty of people to google code and I myself have > > opened up repositories there for my own projects (pv3d is currently out > > there). It's nice for the project leads so they can manage their users, see > > download stats, manage downloads, source etc, - it's pretty nice. The only > > downside is the amount of disc space you get up front (100mb). For Red5, we > > couldn't possibly move out there. > > > > As for mailing lists, I think it's good to have that hosted on OSFlash - it > > definitely is something that consistent and any time someone's asked for a > > change in mail settings, it's something I do right away because it's so > > easy. And most of the time, I don't have to touch a thing, the lead has all > > the power to modify the account. > > > > So the issue as I know it is, google only has so much room, but you can > > request more. But there's not guarantee. I would agree though, we do need > > work on presentation on the site and I'm sure we could brainstorm some great > > ideas for tools to add to OSFlash.org for the developers to present their > > projects. > > > > > > On 5/4/07, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't want to say anything and > > > appear callous (not to say you were Nicolas). Maybe someone could > > > explain why they feel being hosted by OSFlash is important? > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > On 04/05/07, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > > A quick email to give you a heads up on what's happening with the > > > > > OSFlash web site: > > > > [...] > > > > > We're just starting out on this and it will take approximately a month > > > > > of time for us to get the new system in place. > > > > > > > > > > Here's to a new and improved OSFlash in the very near future! :) > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is great news to see that some work is being done on OSFlash.org, > > > > and I surely don't want to discourage it but I think it could be better > > > > used for other stuff. > > > > > > > > In particular, creating and maintaining an automatic system for source > > > > code repository and mailing list is quite time and resources consuming. > > > > Especialy since there's already some very good alternatives such as > > > > Google Code (http://code.google.com) and Google Groups > > > > ( http://groups.google.com) or other equivalent services that are easy > > > > and free to use, with an high level of reliability and support. > > > > > > > > Instead, I would like to see more work being done on structuring the > > > > OSFlash.org website, presenting each project and writing documentation > > > > that tells people how/when to use a particular library or tool. I guess > > > > this would be a lot more efficient than reinventing the wheel. > > > > > > > > Again, work being done OSFlash is always good news, > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > osflash mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > osflash mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > [ JPG ] > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
