Nice one, Guy.
kp
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Guy Watson - FlashGuru LTD wrote:
Double Buffering was necessary in Flash 8, but in Flash 9 with
Actionscript 3 the speed difference between setting pixels on a
bitmapData object that is on the display list and settings pixels
on a bitmapData object that isnt on the display can be reduced
quite significantly with the introduction of the bitmapData.lock()
and bitmapData.unlock() methods.
To decrease the difference in speed some more simply hide the
Bitmap container of the bitmapData object you are setting pixels
on, until you have finished, for example:
package
{
import flash.display.Sprite
import flash.display.Bitmap
import flash.display.BitmapData
import flash.utils.getTimer
public class Test extends Sprite
{
public function Test()
{
var bmp1:BitmapData = new BitmapData(500,500,true,0)
var bmp2:BitmapData = bmp1.clone()
var bmp3:BitmapData = bmp2.clone()
var holder1:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmp1)
addChild(holder1)
var holder2:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmp2)
var start:int
var i:uint
start=getTimer()
bmp1.lock()
holder1.visible=false
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp1.setPixel(Math.random()*500, Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
holder1.visible=false
bmp1.unlock()
trace(getTimer()-start)
start=getTimer()
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp2.setPixel(Math.random()*500,Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
trace(getTimer()-start)
start=getTimer()
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp3.setPixel(Math.random()*500,Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
trace(getTimer()-start)
}
}
}
I get the following results in the output window:
1160
1366
1143
Which is a bit different from the results you get when you dont use
the lock() and unlock() methods, and dont hide the holder bitmap:
package
{
import flash.display.Sprite
import flash.display.Bitmap
import flash.display.BitmapData
import flash.utils.getTimer
public class Test extends Sprite
{
public function Test()
{
var bmp1:BitmapData = new BitmapData(500,500,true,0)
var bmp2:BitmapData = bmp1.clone()
var bmp3:BitmapData = bmp2.clone()
var holder1:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmp1)
addChild(holder1)
var holder2:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmp2)
var start:int
var i:uint
start=getTimer()
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp1.setPixel(Math.random()*500,Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
trace(getTimer()-start)
start=getTimer()
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp2.setPixel(Math.random()*500,Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
trace(getTimer()-start)
start=getTimer()
for(i=0;i<1000000;++i)
{
bmp3.setPixel(Math.random()*500,Math.random()
*500,Math.random()*0xFFFFFFFF)
}
trace(getTimer()-start)
}
}
}
Which outputs:
1377
1356
1130
Kind Regards
Guy
-----------------------------
www.flashguru.co.uk
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
