> Just reading bits and pieces from these threads, I just have one small > point to make.
Me too, as I don't think anyone has explicitly said it. Strk said "shame the framework is AS3 only, any plans to support older bytecode?". This triggered a passionate thread where people said "why should we?" and even "who needs an open source player". Surprising given that this is an open source list and you won't find a friendlier audience. I think the reason for the passionate response is simply this: AS3 is much nicer to code in than AS2. For me personally, you could not pay me enough to code in AS2 again. Porting legacy AS2 code to AS3, then continuing development in AS3, would almost always make more sense. Darren -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/mlsn/ (English-Japanese-German-Chinese-Arabic open source dictionary/semantic network) http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles) _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
