Oh cool, how do you do that? Thanks, -Ben ________________________________ From: osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org [mailto:osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org] On Behalf Of Tomlinson, Gordon Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:39 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] ShadowMap Required OpenGL Extensions
We handle card discrepancies like texture size, number of units etc, by querying the the cards cabalilties and setting up our limits in our programs from them. ( now some dang cards can tell out right lies about what they support and drop to s/w mode at times but thats another story ) Gordon Product Manager 3d __________________________________________________________ Gordon Tomlinson Email : gtomlinson @ overwatch.textron.com __________________________________________________________ ________________________________ From: osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org [mailto:osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org] On Behalf Of Jason Daly Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 3:24 PM To: OpenSceneGraph Users Subject: Re: [osg-users] ShadowMap Required OpenGL Extensions Ben Axelrod wrote: Thanks, Do you think that changing the shadow texture size will have any affect here? I have noticed a somewhat similar failure of ShadowMap when I have a very large mesh file, and decreasing the shadow texture size seems to fix that. Oh, possibly. The GeForce 5's might have had a smaller max texture size, too. It's been a while, so I don't remember the numbers exactly. In general, though, they had tighter limits than the modern cards. --"J"
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
