Paul, In what way has D3D screwed the existing user base with each new release? I'm not trying to argue your point, I just want to understand where you're coming from here.
-Shayne -----Original Message----- From: osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org [mailto:osg-users-boun...@lists.openscenegraph.org] On Behalf Of Paul Martz Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:31 AM To: 'OpenSceneGraph Users' Subject: Re: [osg-users] OpenGL 3.1 at GDC > YES!!!!!!!!!!!! :))))))))))))))) > > but robert, thanks for your arguments! i will use them there. ;) > > best regards to all and other arguments are welcome too! I agree with Robert's sentiment. In many ways, D3D has chosen the easy way out -- supporting only one platform, and screwing the existing user base with each new release. This is the easy way to develop an API. Running cross platform, continuing to evolve and remain relevant, and not screwing existing users is a much harder task, but OpenGL has a proven track record of success in all these areas. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
