Hi Robert,
> > Finally tracked down the thread: > > http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=10619#10619 > > The second message in the thread through me as it came through as : > > "please.. [Shocked]" > > Which suggests a rather impertinent level of impatience, but this > wasn't at all meant. Misunderstanding that can easily sour things > all-round, both for the reader and the original poster. It's silly > once you know what has happened, but knowing this type of thing can > happen is not something obvious until you've seen it once. > Yes, I think in this case, as Roland has already stated out in the thread, user posted this emoticon [Shocked] (here link to the picture http://forum.openscenegraph.org/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif) has misunderstood the meening of this icon. Hmm, I am wonder how to solve that issue, that nobody misunderstand anybody. Even me, if I read the post by looking on the pictures, can not understand what really this emoticon is good in this context for. I think, I could correct it to use the :-) symbols instead of bbcode, i.e. shocked will then be :O instead of [Shocked] . Ok, I'll take a look into it. cheers, art ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=11693#11693 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
