Hello dear OSG users, Let's follow up on this thread, before I make another release of cppintrospection, in order to package it in Debian! (and other operating systems)
2011/3/15 Mike Wozniewski <m...@mikewoz.com>: > In the meantime, there hasn't been a stable tag made for osgIntrospection in > the svn. In order to build it, I usually end up deleting a bunch of wrappers > that don't compile. Furthermore, we don't need all of the osgWrappers. We > just need the core osgIntrospection classes (Type, MethodInfo, etc), as > required for reflection or our own classes that we have derived from OSG. > > * ie, we don't need osgWrappers, just introspection * Yes, we need a tag, so that I can package it for Debian GNU/Linux. We also need it to be packaged separately. > > At some point Robert mentioned that osgIntrospection could become a generic > C++ introspection, and this is the inspiration for 'cppintrospection'... > something that can be used independently of OSG. I like this idea. Less > bloat, and much faster to build for projects like ours. > > I think the name distinction is necessary, since legacy systems that have > versions of OSG < 2.9.9 will contain a library called libosgIntrospection, > that contains (is linked with) all of the osgWrappers. > For the name of the project, Mike Wozniewski and I think we need this project to be renamed cppintrospection to avoid a name clash with the former one, unless I am misled. We still use some old OSG that is packaged in Debian, and it contains a osgIntrospection library. Also, I really want to avoid working with Subversion, as Git is much more fun to work with. Those two issues are not really issues, after all. I would really like to collaborate with you, Wang Rui, and benefit from your future changes to this project. I don't plan to make any change to it, as I am only interested in seeing it packaged, especially for Debian GNU/Linux. For the CMake packaging, I would be totally up for having it aside from the GNU Autotools, but I don't know how to use it, and have no time for this. I know the GNU Autotools, and that's is it for now. So, if I move forward with renaming this library and releasing a 2.12.0 tag to package it for Debian, would you be willing to move along, Wang Rui, and contribute to it? Otherwise, I guess I will simply apply you changes as patches from "upstream" to the gentle "fork". What do you think? Best regards, -- Alexandre Quessy http://alexandre.quessy.net/ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
