Hi, Ulrich
this solution hides from user baseclass set(*T pointer) function which takes
pointer as parameter, so i would rather choose something different
Cheers
27.04.2012, 05:24, "Ulrich Hertlein" <u.hertl...@sandbox.de>:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> On 26/04/12 23:39 , Sergey Polischuk wrote:
>
>> Replying to myself :)
>>
>> Problem is: declaration of set(...) methods in derived Matrix*Template
>> classes hides base class MatrixTemplate::set(...) pack of methods
>> This can be solved by adding line:
>> using MatrixTemplate<[template params]>::set;
>>
>> in each derived class declaration.
>>
>> May be someone have better solution?
>
> There recently was a similar case with the Vector* implementations that could
> be solved by
> using the 'base_class' typedef in each class.
>
> So rather than:
>
> Matrix2Template( const Matrix2Template& mat ) { set(mat.ptr()); }
>
> it would be:
>
> Matrix2Template( const Matrix2Template& mat ) { base_class::set(mat.ptr()); }
>
> Could you try that and submit a patch if it works?
>
> On a related note, it feels weird to have all this Matrix/Vector related
> stuff in the
> 'Uniform' header file, as it can create much confusion with what's already in
> the 'Matrix'
> and 'Vector' header files.
>
> If this is truly Uniform only would it make sense to scope it to
> 'osg::Uniform' or put it
> into separate header files like 'UniformMatrix' and 'UniformVector'?
>
> Thoughts?
> Cheers,
> /ulrich
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
