Thanks for the swift reply! Have you made or are you considering making your own bindings for OSG?
I just haven't managed to make it build, The problem could simply be that the bindings aren't working well with the latest OSG-release. Or any other problem that I'm not aware of. The development of osgPython (and PyOSG forks) seem to have stagnated lately. Since there seems to be a general interrest of including osgPython as a "standard" OSG extension, possibly even a part of the 1.3 release, I would be eager to assist with what little I can do, like extensive testing. Even if it's not osgPython, but some other clever Python binding that uses osgIntrspection, I would be thrilled to help out. /Peter On 2007-01-16 (Tue) 11:50, Robert Osfield wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I haven't downloaded and played with osgPython yet, but I'd raise the > question about the importance of boost for osgPython. > osgIntrospection doesn't need it, so perhaps osgPython could be > changed to remove the boost dependency. I have no clue as how much > work this would be though. > > FYI, genwrapper which builds the wrappers uses boost, but since this > is an external tool that is only required when you update the wrappers > (as I do from time to time) the dependency is pushed on to all users. > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
