Since I pushed at the OSGi board level to move enRoute discussion here, let me take this back (meeting this coming week) and see what we can do. It's not intended to alienate anyone who were enjoying the list as it was. The idea was simply to coalesce two already low volume channels into one... but perhaps that wasn't a good idea after all.
Sincerely, - Ray On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:39 AM, erwindl0 <erwin...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Op 10/20/2016 om 2:35 PM schreef Simon Chemouil: > > Hi Peter, >> >> >> Peter Kriens a écrit le 20/10/2016 13:52 : >> >>> I did a quick check on the last messages on this list: >>> >> [snip] >> >>> So out of more than 60 messages, there were only 5 messages related >>> to OSGi enRoute. Are these your problem? Since I will spend much less >>> time on OSGi enRoute a new release is unlikely. >>> >> Maybe I am wrong to characterize it as enRoute. I don't know. >> >> I do count those Zigbee messages, the native library >> loading, and so on, as enRoute support. Mostly because the authors come >> with a "Help me solve my whole problem" mindset, and I believe they came >> to post here because they are trying enRoute (because they said so). >> >> Karaf's ML has a lot of similar "general questions about Java/shell >> help/OSGi" threads, because many Karaf users consider the whole of it as >> a stack and often don't know where to ask (or don't care since they get >> help wherever they ask anyway!). I believe Karaf has split their lists >> between karaf-users@ for general purpose and karaf-devs@ and for more >> specific spec/higher-level discussion. >> >> >> By my count since it moved here more than 30% of all mail count has been >> posted here because osgi-dev is the enRoute support list. (~180 mails >> since ~20th of september, 60+ very basic "Help me" requests). >> >> My problem is with the quality of the discussed content. I stayed 2 days >> on Karaf's users@ ML before unregistering because of the amount of >> StackOverflow/IRC kind of questions. My problem is seing the content >> quality of osgi-dev@ decreasing, and because the quality was satisfying >> before: mostly spec discussion on specific points, not "Help me I'm >> lost" questions. >> >> If no one else has that feeling, fine. I'm asking if others do. Łukasz >> Dywicki seemed to say so quite early on I suppose he and maybe other >> share the sentiment. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > -- *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay) Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List osgi-dev@mail.osgi.org https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
