I don't have access to the members area.
There's a reference implementation?
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
The same question can be asked for when host bundles become
unresolved. Do the old attached fragments get delegated to? The
specification needs some clarification here.
In the reference implementation the localization properties files
are cached as they are requested (but this is not required by the
specification). When a bundle becomes unresolved then it converts
to only searching locally for new localization properties file
requests but the old cached properties values can still be used if
a language is requested again which already exists in the
properties cache after a bundle becomes unresolved. If/When the
bundle becomes resolved again then the cache is cleared and the
language files are searched again.
I opened https://www2.osgi.org/members/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=570
against OSGi to clarify.
Tom
<graycol.gif>
Alan Cabrera ---10/07/2007 01:30:03 AM---Another question along a
similar vein. What happens to getHeaders()
<ecblank.gif>
From:
<ecblank.gif>
Alan Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<ecblank.gif>
To:
<ecblank.gif>
OSGi Developer Mail List <[email protected]>
<ecblank.gif>
Date:
<ecblank.gif>
10/07/2007 01:30 AM
<ecblank.gif>
Subject:
<ecblank.gif>
Re: [osgi-dev] Finding Localization Entries
Another question along a similar vein. What happens to getHeaders()
when a fragment gets unresolved? It didn't seem to clear in the
spec, unless I missed something. I'm guessing that it delegates to
it's old host but maybe it could just serve up headers using what
ever l10n entries it could find locally.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:42 AM, BJ Hargrave wrote:
> :-)
>
> During R4 spec development we allowed fragments to attach to
multiple
> hosts. Prior to going final on R4, we changed course and limited
> fragments
> to only attach to a single host. The sentence you quote is left
> over from
> when we considered allowing fragments to attach to multiple hosts.
> Also
> see the method signature of PackageAdmin.getHosts where the return
> type is
> an array and not a scalar.
>
> We are currently discussing revisiting that decision. That is, to
> potentially allow a fragment to attach to multiple hosts. It
would be
> useful to get input from the OSGi community on the pros and cons of
> such a
> change.
> From:
> Alan Cabrera
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get my head around 3.10.1 Finding Localization
> Entries. The last sentence of the first paragraph confuses me.
>
> "Fragment bundles must delegate the search for a localization entry
> to their host bundle with the lowest bundle ID."
>
> Does this mean that fragment bundles can have multiple hosts?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
<graycol.gif>
<ecblank.gif>
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
http://www2.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
