Morocco still shoots the messenger By Aboubakr Jamai Thursday, January 06, 2005 [From: Daily Star (Beirut)]
Morocco's King Mohammed VI, who ascended the throne in 1999 following the death of his father King Hassan II, is moving ahead with reforms in some areas such as women's rights. But he maintains an ambivalent, sometimes hostile attitude toward the country's new independent press. This press, which consists of several weekly newspapers published in Arabic and French, emerged in the second half of the 1990's. The collective circulation of newspapers exceeds 100,000, a sizeable figure by Moroccan standards. Those independent from political parties, the government and the palace have broken many taboos in the past five years by investigating human rights abuses committed by the security apparatus, the corruption of government officials and the fortune of the king. For this, they have found themselves in frequent confrontation with the government. During the king's first year on the throne, some independent journals were banned and their journalists harassed. Press repression has worsened in the wake of the government's "fight against terrorism," launched after the May 16, 2003 terrorist bombings in Casablanca. Two journalists were the first victims of the anti-terrorist law passed soon after the attacks. They were jailed after publishing a letter from a man claiming responsibility for the bombings and for conducting an interview with a member of an illegal Islamist group. Only after intense national and international campaigns did the government release them. Some analysts attribute such clampdowns as part of a necessary phase of adjustment for King Mohammed VI. They also describe it as a reaction to the audacity of the independent press, which, in their view, justifies government control. Such views are misleading. They imply that political and media liberalization began under the reign of the present king. In fact, it was during the last years of the reign of Hassan II that a gradual, yet steady opening of the media sector occurred. The press criticized government policies more openly, and published, without incurring the wrath of the palace, path-breaking stories about the three first decades of the rule of Hassan II, a time known for widespread human rights violations. The views are also undermined by facts. If the repression of independent media at the beginning of the reign of Mohammed VI reflected his inexperience instead of an anti-liberal vision, then how can ongoing repressive measures be explained more than five years into his reign? To answer this question it is important to understand the editorial line of publications that have been the target of harassment. The independent papers have been unrelenting in their defense of democratic ideals. They have argued for constitutional reforms to reduce the powers of the monarchy and enhance those of the elected Parliament. They have investigated cases of torture perpetrated by the secret police of the new regime. They have published exposes revealing the monarchy's harmful involvement in the Moroccan business world. These publications were the recipients of executive orders banning them, and later of judicial harassment. Such repressive tactics were staunchly denounced, notably by international human rights groups. The criticism tarnished the monarchy's image abroad, and subsequently, the authorities tried to use less conspicuous methods. Aware that the economic survival of independent weeklies hinges on advertising revenues, they exerted pressure on companies to stop doing business with them. As most advertising companies are state-owned or controlled by the king, this tactic was relatively easy to carry out. As a result, the independent press is struggling to survive. In the legal sector, the regime's attitude was manifested in its 2001 reform of the press code. Although the new code was free of some repressive elements of earlier texts, its spirit was the same. It preserved penalties of up to five years imprisonment for those who defamed the royal family. It affirmed the government's right to ban Moroccan or foreign journals if the publications "undermine Islam, the monarchy, territorial integrity, or public order." Morocco's subservient judiciary has shown little hesitation to interpret this broad-brush legal wording in the most repressive manner. Such an attitude is particularly shortsighted, because the independent press offers a public space in which members of society can peacefully debate one another on controversial issues - a space generally lacking in Morocco. A case in point is the debate surrounding the reform of the personal status code, or mudawwana, to expand women's rights. In June 2002, the independent weekly Le Journal Hebdomadaire convened and published the proceedings of a debate between Nadia Yassine, a representative of Al-Adl wa al-Ihsan, one of Morocco's most popular Islamist movements, and Said Saadi, a former minister who had first proposed the reforms. At the time, the topic was still highly sensitive and politically charged. The civilized debate allowed both points of view to be expressed in a peaceful setting, and signaled the possibility of adopting changes without great social cleavage. Yassine announced that her movement was not opposed to the proposed reforms. This weakened the position of radical Islamists who staunchly opposed the reforms and gave the upper hand to the liberals and secularists who strongly supported them. With Islamists further weakened by the involvement of radical Islamists in the 2003 bombings, the code was amended with relatively little controversy in 2004. The independent press had helped to dampen down a subject that had, until then, been extremely sensitive. Aboubakr Jamai is the founding editor of Le Journal Hebdomadaire and Al-Sahifa, two independent weeklies in Morocco. He is a 2004 Yale World Fellow at Yale University. This commentary, which was translated from the French by Julia Choucair, is reprinted with permission from the Arab Reform Bulletin Vol. 2, issue 11 (December 2004) www.CarnegieEndowment.org/ArabReform (c) 2004, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=5&article_id= 11552 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Give underprivileged students the materials they need to learn. Bring education to life by funding a specific classroom project. http://us.click.yahoo.com/FHLuJD/_WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
