<http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/tech/passport-technology-identity-rfid-dod-dhs-41923.html>

E-Commerce News: Technology

Technology

Critics Call Proposed US Passport Technology 'Dangerous'
By Jay Lyman
www.TechNewsWorld.com
 Part of the ECT News Network
 03/31/05 12:01 PM PT

Avi Rubin, whose Johns Hopkins research team found major security gaps in
common RFID systems earlier this year, indicated the passport technology
proposed by the U.S. is fraught with danger.

A U.S. State Department proposal to include wireless data chips in U.S.
passports has been met with a wave of criticism and concern from privacy
activists and security experts who fail to see any value in the wireless
technology for passports. The chips could only serve to compromise personal
data and put U.S. citizens at risk, they argue.

U.S. officials with the Department of Homeland Security have tried to
deflect the privacy and security concerns that have dogged radio frequency
identification (RFID), calling the proposed passport technology a
"contactless chip" or "contactless integrated circuit" that differs from
RFID.

 Privacy Concerns

 Avi Rubin, director of the Johns Hopkins Information Security Institute,
told TechNewsWorld that there are several technologies -- such as
close-proximity passes and radio bar codes -- that are all termed RFID
despite significant differences.

However, Rubin, whose Johns Hopkins research team found major security gaps
in common RFID systems earlier this year, indicated the passport technology
proposed by the U.S. is fraught with danger to the carriers of the
high-tech documents.

"I don't think changing the name is going to change any of the privacy
concerns," he said. "Whatever you call them, something with radio frequency
in passports is a terrible idea. I can't see the need for wireless. I can
only see negatives. I can't see any positives. I only see disadvantages to
this."

 Wrong Technology

 The U.S. State Department and DHS, however, are pursuing use of the
technology in passports and in identification cards for DHS employees. Last
month, the State Department proposed passports and some other
identification documents would be required to use RFID tags with personal
data and even biometric information made available to customs officials
with scanners.

Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) policy counsel Cedric Laurant
told TechNewsWorld the passport tags, which, unlike the DHS employee cards,
would not be protected by encryption, would allow anyone with access to an
inexpensive scanner to wirelessly identify and gather information on
Americans without them knowing it.

"It's not at all the technology to use for passports," Laurant said. "It
doesn't make sense to use it for that."

Laurant, who said the U.S. is pushing for the same passport technology to
be adopted by other nations as well, claimed the only reason for the
technology was for surreptitious surveillance of U.S. citizens by the
government.

 Big Brother

 "There is no other explainable motive for deploying that technology," he
said, adding that the wireless access could be leveraged by criminals or
terrorists to identify nationalities and sensitive information. Laurant
said EPIC is filing comments in opposition of the passport proposal in the
next few days.

Rubin -- whose research team has started a company,  Independent Security
Evaluators  to crack RFID systems so their makers can better secure them --
said he was actually approached by DHS regarding the passport wireless
technology last year, but the department did not follow up.

 Rubin said he could see the need for RFID in a shipping or delivery
business such as UPS, but did not see the point of the wireless technology
when citizens are passing their documents over the counter to officials
when traveling.

 Blinded By Technology

 Officials with the DHS and State Department were not immediately available
for comment on the proposed passport technology. Bill Scannell, a privacy
advocate who has started the Web site www.rfidkills.com, said despite
efforts to find a motive, it is unclear why the U.S. is pushing the issue.

He echoed Rubin in stating that the government appeared to be using
technology for the sake of using technology and not for cost or efficiency
gains.

"I think they're blinded by technology," Scannell told TechNewsWorld.

He added that the plan has been met with such strong resistance "because
people see the inherent dangers in this technology."

-- 
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Take a look at donorschoose.org, an excellent charitable web site for
anyone who cares about public education!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/_OLuKD/8WnJAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to