http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/trivializing_national_security.html
Yesterday, House Democrats once again showed the electorate why they cannot
be entrusted with the nation's national security. Incredibly, the Democrats
are insisting that the Intelligence Authorization Act include a provision
funding a global warming study.
Texas Democrat Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman
preposterously argued that "this is an area we may vulnerable in terms of
potential terrorists."
May 11, 2007
Trivializing National Security
By <http://www.americanthinker.com/christopher_j_alleva/> Christopher J.
Alleva
Yesterday, House Democrats once again showed
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070510-120704-7411r.htm> the
electorate why they cannot be entrusted with the nation's national security.
Incredibly, the Democrats are insisting that the Intelligence Authorization
Act include a provision funding a global warming study. Texas Democrat
Silvestre Reyes, Intelligence Committee Chairman preposterously argued that
"this is an area we may vulnerable in terms of potential terrorists."
I understand many terrorists claim a special hot-line to God, but to date I
have yet to see any evidence of a connection. So let me get this straight,
Democrats believe there is a link between terrorists and global warming but
not Al Qa'eda and Iraq. And those Chlorine Bombs they are now blowing up in
Iraq, no they're not WMD.
Mr. Reyes and other Democrats claim that nearly a dozen Generals support the
plan.
As usual, the Democrats found some shills at the Pentagon to give their
boondoggle a veneer of legitimacy. Vice Admiral Richard Truly, former
commander of the Navy Space Command said he believes global warming issue is
urgent. To pass the straight face test, Truly clarified his position,
"Its an issue, not in the sense the climate is going to declare war on the
United States its not that kind of problem but its slowly building stress
and its time to build into the nation's security planning."
No word from Democrats or their pliant Generals on the rapidly building
stress being caused by their instant failure to fund the troops on the
battlefield.
Fortunately, there are serious voices objecting to this farce. Peter
Hoekstra, the ranking Republican on the committee called the global warming
intelligence funding "inappropriate." He said, "It sends exactly the wrong
signal"
Yes, I think the CIA already has a full portfolio. What with tracking nukes
in North Korea and Iran not to mention numerous security threats all over
the World, anyone of which could morph into the next 9/11. This is hardly
the first time the Democrats have hijacked national security for their own
selfish political interests. A look back at the CIA's public website
provides ample evidence of this.
The public press release pages are mainly reserved for links to major public
announcements like the opening of a new language school, newspaper op-eds,
public media interviews by the Director, courteous salutations, and
retirement testimonials. During the Clinton Administration some of the
public announcements betrayed how unserious the Commander in Chief was about
intelligence and national security.
In October of 1994, the CIA announced with great fanfare that they were
reinventing government. Hallelujah, Clinton had them joining the global war
against, drum-roll please, breast cancer
<http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/press_release/1994/pr101194.html> .
This is a critical part of the CIA's mission? How does this advance national
security?
It may not be critical to national security but it was important to
Clinton's electoral security. Pandering to the women's vote was an
imperative. With characteristically hyperbolic rhetoric, CIA Director
Woolsey commented
"what we are trying to do is to use tools developed to protect the lives of
250,000,000 Americans toward also using them to help save the lives of a
substantial share of the 46,000 women who die annually of breast cancer."
>From the pinnacle of near perfect ignorance, Woolsey further declared
"Breast cancer is a problem of pressing national importance. Reinvention of
government applies in our community as much as it does in the rest of the
federal government."
See, breast cancer is a national security issue, Director Woolsey says so.
In June of 1995, Clinton couldn't pass up this chance to rile up the female
voters, announcing the CIA settlement of a Class Action Suit
<https://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/press_release/1995/ps6995.html>
brought by female CIA case officers. This was great for Clinton, a twofer:
the trial lawyers and the gals.
I wonder if that world famous spy, Valerie Plame got in on this action.?
In December the CIA announced a technology sharing agreement with
<https://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/press_release/1996/pr120996.html>
Navajo Indian Nation. This was after the election, perhaps it was a payback
by Clinton for a tribal campaign contribution. Needless to say, this hardly
enhanced national security. It did distract from the mission
<https://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/press_release/1999/pr101499.html> .
In October of 1999, the Central Intelligence Agency hosted a premiere
screening of Showtime and Paramount Network Television spy thriller, In The
Company Of Spies. Staging movie premieres at CIA headquarters, this is just
perfect. For Clinton, the whole idea was to fool people into thinking they
were actually interested in the serious business of intelligence, when in
reality it was all just an act. How better to accomplish this than producing
a propaganda film about the CIA's heroics. Things must have been a little
slow out in Langley, for the press release indicates 50 agency employees
volunteered as extras.
I wonder if this when super spy Valerie Plame got the movie
<http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117960479.html?categoryid=13&cs=1> bug?
Most assuredly, a few CIA public press releases are not sufficient proof of
the apparent institutional breakdown at the agency. But these are merely the
most egregious examples; there is much more. There is however, a great deal
of other evidence that suggests just how badly the CIA lost its way under
Clinton. This is well documented in an eerily précis cent piece from Insight
Magazine written days before 9/11/2001 by J. Michael Waller titled "Ground
Down CIA <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_37_17/ai_79051714>
Still In the Pit." In it, Waller details the near collapse of the CIA under
Clinton. Bloated management staffs, crippled human intel capability, an
ossified bureaucracy, excessive out-sourcing to foreign intelligence
agencies, defective quality control, rampant security breaches, ill
motivated leaks of classified material to the press, a high level cover up
of former director John Deutch's negligent handling of classified material,
and gross politicization of the agency by Clinton political appointees.
It is difficult to imagine how the CIA could have been any more broken at
9/11.
Illustrating just how far the CIA had deviated from their core basic
intelligence-gathering mission is the story of the now infamous diversity
quilt ordered by Clinton appointee Nora Slatkin. The quilt is referred to in
an Oct <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3724/is_200110/ai_n9002630>
2001 piece written by the highly regarded British writer, Andrew Roberts for
the Spectator.
To make his point, Roberts cheekily poses the question:
"So where was Felix Leiter? In the James Bond movies the threatened climax
is...always averted by James and his competent and dependable CIA friend
(Leiter). Not this time. When Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda organization was
planning its spectacular attack on the heart of Western capitalism, Mr.
Leiter, it seems, was at his headquarters in Langley, Virginia, either on a
sensitivity-- training course or, perhaps, sowing a `diversity quilt'. No
fewer than 20,000 CIA man-hours have been spent on those activities in the
past year."
Stories abound of managers going to subordinates' offices to check up on
their intelligence projects and being told they didn't have time to do their
work because they had go sew the "diversity quilt." Apparently under
Clinton, time wasting became an art at Langley. Waller recounts the policy
requiring professionals to take sensitivity classes and do role-playing
about how stereotypical language and attitudes create a hurtful workplace
environment.
I'm sure tyrants like Ayman al Zawahiri and Kim jong Ill will feel much
better knowing CIA case officers have their requisite sensitivity training.
The House Democrats have done a real service by reminding the nation what
happens when you place National Security under their stewardship. Driven by
their legion of special interest groups the Democrats are inevitably
compelled to consider everything but national security when making national
security policy. Making global warming a national security issue may set
certain special interests' hearts aflutter, but it does not make good
policy.
Unless and until the Democrats can escape from the thrall of their special
interests, they will remain unqualified to run the nation's national
security.
Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/05/trivializing_national_security.html
at May 12, 2007 - 11:54:55 AM EDT
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
