________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mario Profaca
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SPY NEWS] Why Al Qaeda 1.0 Still Matters



http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=1401
<http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=1401> 
Why Al Qaeda 1.0 Still Matters
Douglas Farah
15 Dec 2007

The Dec. 11 attack in Algiers by Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb shows
that the old guard of al Qaeda, what some analysts call al Qaeda 1.0
(rather than the new, decentralized structure) still matters.

As Craig Whitlock noted in the Washington Post, the group (formerly
known as the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat-GSPC) has
markedly improved is capabilities since formally allying with al Qaeda
14 months ago. 

What is striking, as noted by my colleague Evan Kohlmann in that piece
and elsewhere, is the quantum leap in the propaganda capabilities of
AQIM, the ability to film the attack and rapidly make high-quality
video available on the Internet. 

The simultaneous nature of the rising sophistication of AQIM,
particularly its "media" wing, and the formal alliance with al Qaeda
central strike me as more than a passing coincidence. 

It is increasingly clear that the old guard, operating from Pakistan
and the border region with Afghanistan, has regrouped and is in more
direct communication with its affiliates than it was 6 months ago.

Resources still flow through them, perhaps not in as centralized a
form as before, but again, a reconsolidated resource gathering and
distribution appears to have been established. A formal alliance
brings certain benefits that freelance operators, and perhaps some
homegrown groups, do not have, particularly in access to military and
propaganda training, as well as economic resources. 

I am not disputing the validity of the al Qaeda 2.0 thesis put forward
by Peter Bergan and others. I think it is accurate in describing how
the Salafist networks are shape shifting to carry on their struggle in
many parts of the world. It is also useful, however, to not lose sight
of the fact that the bin Laden's of the world still matter and still
wield a great deal of influence.

The pattern of the spread of al Qaeda to northern Africa is the same
as elsewhere around the globe, facilitating what the old guard is so
adept at.

Across Mauritania, Mali and much of the rest of the Maghreb there has
been a huge influx of Saudi government funds to facilitate the
building of mosques and schools to spread wahhabist theology. This is
accompanied by the rapid growth of wahhabist charities that, financed
in large part by Saudi petrodollars, can offer goods and services the
state or the poorer Islamic groups, simply cannot. 

The pattern of penetration of Saudi money and clerics, coupled with
NGOs that have little oversight by either the Saudi or the host
government, has been seen from Bosnia to Pakistan to northern Nigeria
and Indonesia. 

With these groups providing the ideological/theological softening up,
those advocating direct violence are harvesting in well-plowed ground.
This is how the old guard al Qaeda has traditionally operated. This is
why the Maghreb is in such danger. 

It is also increasingly clear that the old guard has learned that the
impact of any operation can be greatly amplified by being able to
reproduce images of the attack on the Internet, creating the sensation
of a divinely-led blow to in infidel. 

The fact that soft targets everywhere are extremely vulnerable and
that the attacks may not require a great deal of skill, are not
mentioned. The images of government buildings in flames and panicked
civilians fleeing, are enough to show the hand of Allah in the victory. 

We see these propaganda strides in Iraq, in the increasing frequency
and sophistication of the communications by bin Laden and Zawahiri,
and the ability of groups like AQIM to quickly produce evidence of
their attacks.

As long as they are able to do this, their ability to recruit from an
already-prepared population will remain high.




--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to