_http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=68492_
<http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=68492_>  
(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=68492
<http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=68492> ) 
NRA aims big-budget blitz at Obama
'We look forward to showing him bitter'
July 01, 2008
C 2008 WorldNetDaily 

The National Rifle Association has declared Barack Obama a "serious threat" 
to Second Amendment gun liberties and now plans to spend $15 million of its 
$40 million campaign this fall to make sure he isn't elected.

Referring to Obama's statement in April that when working-class voters 
experience economic hardship "they get bitter, they cling to guns or
religion," 
NRA chief lobbyist Chris W. Cox told the Politico, "We look forward to
showing 
him 'bitter.'"

"Apparently, he thinks gun owners are either fools or have short memories," 
Cox said. "I can assure him he's wrong on both."

The NRA's Institute for Legislative Action already carries on its website an

article that lists 21 "facts" from Obama's record pointing to the Democratic

candidate's history of opposing Second Amendment issues. The multi-million 
dollar campaign this fall will seek to communicate that message to the NRA's

more than 4 million members and to an even larger nationwide audience.

According to Politico, the NRA strategy will include automated phone calls 
and mail to its members, pre-election editions of the association's three 
magazines, and a media blitz of TV, radio and newspaper ads in key
battleground 
states.

One of those states may be 21-electoral-vote Pennsylvania, where the state's

Game Commission rates it first in the nation in the amount of time its 
citizens spend hunting and the NRA has the most members per capita of any
state.

"Our members understand that if Barack Obama is elected president," Cox 
said, "and he has support in the Senate to confirm anti-gun Supreme Court 
nominees, (the District of Columbia v. Heller decision) could be taken away
from us."

The 5-4 Heller decision, as WND reported earlier, reaffirmed the 
individual's right to gun ownership by striking down a Washington, D.C., ban
on handguns 
and concluding that the Constitution does not permit "the absolute 
prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."

Republican presidential hopeful John McCain signed a friend-of-the-court 
brief in the D.C. case affirming his belief that the Second Amendment
confers an 
individual right to bear arms and praised the decision publicly.

Obama, however, did not sign the brief and released a statement afterward 
that carefully straddled both sides of the issue.

Campaign spokesperson Tommy Vietor told Politico, "Sen. Obama has always 
believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear

arms and will uphold the constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners, 
hunters and sportsmen as president."

The NRA, however, is not buying the rhetoric and sees Obama as a threat. The

NRA-ILA website points to an ABC News report from February where Obama 
seemed to support the D.C. gun ban against the Supreme Court's
constitutional 
arguments, saying, "The notion that somehow local jurisdictions can't
initiate 
gun safety laws to deal with gangbangers and random shootings on the street 
isn't born out by our Constitution."

Though the NRA has not endorsed McCain for president in the upcoming 
election, it intends to let the nation know that Obama is not an acceptable
choice. 
"Our members understand how bad Barack Obama is on the Second Amendment,"
Cox 
told Politico.


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to