One in four US hackers 'is an FBI informer'

 

The FBI and US secret service have used the threat of prison to create an

army of informers among online criminals

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/us-hackers-fbi-informer

 


One in four US hackers 'is an FBI informer'


The FBI and US secret service have used the threat of prison to create an
army of informers among online criminals

.          

*        
*
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Ftech
nology%2F2011%2Fjun%2F06%2Fus-hackers-fbi-informer&t=One%20in%20four%20US%20
hackers%20'is%20an%20FBI%20informer'%20%7C%20Technology%20%7C%20The%20Guardi
an&src=sp> Share332 
*
<http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guardian.co.uk%2Ftechnology%2
F2011%2Fjun%2F06%2Fus-hackers-fbi-informer> Reddit
*
<http://uk.buzz.yahoo.com/buzz?publisherurn=the_guardian665&targetUrl=http:/
/www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/us-hackers-fbi-informer&summary=T
he+FBI+and+US+secret+service+have+used+the+threat+of+prison+to+create+an+arm
y+of+informers+among+online+criminals&headline=%20One%20in%20four%20US%20hac
kers%20'is%20an%20FBI%20informer'%20|%20Technology%20|%20The%20Guardian%20>
Buzz up

*       Comments (
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/us-hackers-fbi-informer#st
art-of-comments> 55) 

*       Ed Pilkington <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/edpilkington>  in
New York 
*       guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk> , Monday 6 June 2011
16.12 BST 
*       Article history
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/us-hackers-fbi-informer#hi
story-link-box> 

A hacker's silhouette

A quarter of hackers in the US have been recruited by federal authorities,
according to Eric Corley, publisher of the hacker quarterly, 2600.
Photograph: Getty Images

The underground world of computer hackers has been so thoroughly infiltrated
in the US by the FBI <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/fbi>  and secret
service that it is now riddled with paranoia and mistrust, with an estimated
one in four hackers secretly informing on their peers, a Guardian
investigation has established.

Cyber policing units have had such success in forcing online criminals to
co-operate with their investigations through the threat of long prison
sentences that they have managed to create an army of informants deep inside
the hacking <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/hacking>  community.

In some cases, popular illegal forums used by cyber criminals as
marketplaces for stolen identities and credit card numbers have been run by
hacker turncoats acting as FBI moles. In others, undercover FBI agents
posing as "carders" - hackers specialising in ID theft - have themselves
taken over the management of crime forums, using the intelligence gathered
to put dozens of people behind bars.

So ubiquitous has the FBI informant network become that Eric Corley, who
publishes the hacker quarterly, 2600, has estimated that 25% of hackers in
the US may have been recruited by the federal authorities to be their eyes
and ears. "Owing to the harsh penalties involved and the relative
inexperience with the law that many hackers have, they are rather
susceptible to intimidation," Corley told the Guardian.

"It makes for very tense relationships," said John Young, who runs Cryptome,
a website depository for secret documents along the lines of WikiLeaks.
"There are dozens and dozens of hackers who have been shopped by people they
thought they trusted."

The best-known example of the phenomenon is Adrian Lamo, a convicted hacker
who turned informant on Bradley Manning, who is suspected of passing secret
documents to WikiLeaks. Manning had entered into a prolonged instant
messaging conversation with Lamo, whom he trusted and asked for advice. Lamo
repaid that trust by promptly handing over the 23-year-old intelligence
specialist to the military authorities. Manning has now been in custody for
more than a year.

For acting as he did, Lamo has earned himself the sobriquet of Judas and the
"world's most hated hacker", though he has insisted that he acted out of
concern for those he believed could be harmed or even killed by the
WikiLeaks publication of thousands of US diplomatic cables.

"Obviously it's been much worse for him but it's certainly been no picnic
for me," Lamo has said. "He followed his conscience, and I followed mine."

The latest challenge for the FBI in terms of domestic US breaches are the
anarchistic co-operatives of "hacktivists" that have launched several
high-profile cyber-attacks in recent months designed to make a statement. In
the most recent case a group calling itself Lulz Security
<http://lulzsecurity.com/>  launched an audacious raid
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jun/06/lulz-security-hackers-coll
ective-infragard>  on the FBI's own linked organisation InfraGard. The raid,
which was a blatant two fingers up at the agency, was said to have been a
response to news that the Pentagon was poised to declare foreign
cyber-attacks an act of war.

Lulz Security shares qualities with the hacktivist group Anonymous that has
launched attacks against companies including Visa and MasterCard as a
protest against their decision to block donations to WikiLeaks. While Lulz
Security is so recent a phenomenon that the FBI has yet to get a handle on
it, Anonymous is already under pressure from the agency. There were raids on
40 addresses in the US and five in the UK in January, and a grand jury has
been hearing evidence against the group in California at the start of a
possible federal prosecution.

Kevin Poulsen, senior editor at Wired magazine, believes the collective is
classically vulnerable to infiltration and disruption. "We have already
begun to see Anonymous members attack each other and out each other's IP
addresses. That's the first step towards being susceptible to the FBI."

Barrett Brown, who has acted as a spokesman for the otherwise secretive
Anonymous, says it is fully aware of the FBI's interest. "The FBI are always
there. They are always watching, always in the chatrooms. You don't know who
is an informant and who isn't, and to that extent you are vulnerable."

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to