Hi there, I'm looking for some advice - I'm sure as soon as I've sent this email off the answers will be obvious, but for the moment I need your wisdom.
I've been contracted to facilitate an open space forum for our food regulator as a basis for developing a dialogue about the NZ food safety programme. Given the topic and the people passion won't be a problem! There have been some other meetings of this group with mixed success. One of the critical issues of concern about the forum is the accuracy and validity of the statements made by participants during the forum. There have apparently been occasions when statements have been made about the safety and consequences of some products and processes, that latter have been found not to be accurate or true. However in the meantime a whole lot of work got done on these areas that was not in the end valuable or necessary. I recognise that sometimes false starts lead to new discoveries however I am wondering if here is anything that I could do in the preparation of the forum that would focus on the validity of contribution. Your thoughts would be welcome. Thanks Anne -- Anne Pattillo Anne Pattillo Consulting Ltd PO Box 683 Wellington New Zealand Telephone 0064 4 473 2702 Fax 0064 4 473 2703 * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
