At 09:18 07-09-2003 +0930, Alan Stewart wrote:

There are periodic indications that some of us are using both OST and Café
processes, sometimes independently and sometimes in combination. In my
experience this can be very effective in contexts in which each is appropriate.

Thanks for calling the attention for the relation between OST and World
Café and for your report(s) on your experiences in using both.

Only knowing Café from the Internet, I came to the conclusion that the two
methods have some similarities, even if I think that Café is a little more
structured, a little less self-organizing and the facilitator must be more
present and slightly more directive than in OST. Do you agree with this?

Indeed I would like to see other reports from facilitators that use OST and
other "large groups facilitation methods" (separated or combined) on the
similarities and differences among them.
I am particularly curious about the experiences of facilitators that in
some cases use OST (where the facilitator must be fully present but
completely invisible") and other methods (where the facilitator is
completely visible and always intervening and directing the action through
regular steps). I would think those two approaches are philosophically
incompatible, but I am probably wrong.

Anyone would like to enlighten me?

Regards

Artur










A story of how they were used together in a series of community
consultations can be seen at:



In Conversing Cafes people come out on top downunder.
<http://www.theworldcafe.com/storyconversing.html>http://www.theworldcafe.com/storyconversing.html



Many people have commented on how useful they found the observed
correspondence between purpose and process and outcome in this now well
known ‘Marion Story’.  Reportedly it played a role in bringing about a
cultural shift to 'all voices being heard' in the Financial Planning
Association in the US.
<http://www.theworldcafe.com/storyfpa.html>http://www.theworldcafe.com/storyfpa.html



I wonder if you see that we could all benefit if the power and potential
of these two processes was widely recognised by leaders through their
having personal experience of them?



A remarkable opportunity to do this with both has come my way recently. In
each state in Australia there are leadership programs offered annually in
which young ‘high fliers’ (people who have proven work experience and
capability, vision and commitment) are given a comprehensive set of
experiences to prepare them to assume leadership positions beyond their
workplace. Participants are recruited from a wide range of backgrounds,
industries and sectors - including business, government, social, community
and the arts.



The (new) director of this program in South Australia contacted me mid
year to express her concern that the current group were not communicating
at anything beyond superficial levels and that she had heard on the wind
that I might be able to assist.



One emerging is that, in the two day final retreat in November, the whole
of the first day is to be allocated to:



Conversation Cafe (morning) ‘Reflection on the year’

Open Space Technology (afternoon)  ‘Where to from here ….’



in order to address the theme:



               How may we make the most of the experience of being
participants in this program?



My intuition is that the intimacy and inclusivity of sitting at small
tables in the Café while reflecting on their shared experience will
promote the listening and questioning through which participants may reach
deeper levels of awareness, understanding and of relating.



And then in the Open Space session the conditions will be right for all to
announce what they feel 'bold and wild' about, and for like passioned
people to link with each other.



Whether it happens like this remains to be seen!



(In next year's course, these processes will be introduced at the outset).



I would add that, whichever process I use when facilitating/hosting, I
invariably invoke the principles of OST. And I do not name an event Open
Space unless it is the whole ‘box and dice.’



Also I use capitalized ‘Café’ when alluding to the process and when using
diverse descriptors such as ‘Conversation’, ‘Passion’, ‘Collective
Wisdom’, ‘Knowledge’ Café.



With love



Alan

Adelaide








* * ==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To
subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu,
Visit:

http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

Reply via email to