dear spacenik friends,

I'd just like to share that on Saturday we held a daylong OST event for Occupy 
here in San Diego. 50 souls showed up and worked with passion. 

Nothing truly earth-shattering to report. 


People left feeling very inspired, satisfied. Perhaps the work of this event 
was more directed towards building trust, building community than anything 
else. As one Unitarian Universalist minister (he mentioned to me that he'd 
taken part in a multiday OST event for 4,000 Unitarians!...and while that found 
that event to be fruitful, organizing it seemed like too much work to them so 
they didn't want to hold their annual meeting in OST in subsequent years) who 
took part pointed out, Occupy skipped the work of creating a foundation of 
relationships and community before moving to action and now it's doing that 
work.

New things for me:
* as part of my personal preparation for the event this was the first time I 
used an applied awareness tool called "Catastrophizing Consciously," which, 
among other things, prepares one to be surprised. This was especially helpful 
because one of my fears was that someone would disrupt the opening. And we have 
had our share of provocateurs here in San Diego. Doing that preparation 
reminded me that no one (and everyone) is in charge...

It was interesting that right after the opening someone did try to take 
charge-- and was ignored.


One of my fears was that since the organizing group did not include many key 
people in Occupy locally (I was the original "caller") that the event would not 
have weight and would not be well-attended. However, actively seeking 
co-inviters and endorsements from the multitude of local Occupy sites gave the 
event weight.

* One question that remained unanswered to me was how or if to engage/invite 
the one Occupy group many don't like and trust. I had seen one of the people 
from that group in other meetings very skillfully manipulate and disrupt 
meetings (as best as I can guess- and I can't prove it- it looks like the 
actions of someone working for the authorities). So, I was not prepared to 
invite that person into the planning and while I did want to personally invite 
that group to the event, others were not prepared to do so. In the end, they 
came anyway. And things were fine.

But I'm curious, how have you dealt with a person or people in a planning group 
who seem to be anxious to subvert the process? Or in an OST meeting?

I'll explain a little more: I'd seen this person basically make meetings grind 
to a halt by following process to a "T"- (reminds me of the "Work to Rule" 
strikes  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work-to-rule ).

Again, I want to thank this community and the training I received from Birgitt 
Williams in the Genuine Contact approach to OST in making this event 
successful. There were a number of little things from fellow practitioners that 
informed this event. And the careful and thorough approach to planning offered 
in the Genuine Contact Program ensured we had a good foundation of trust within 
the planning group to do the work.

in gratitude,
raffi




 
powered by ubuntu 10.4
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to