Let me make a correction on this:
Later I have continued to learn in a larger community of practice organized
around 6 professional Congresses, that I have proposed and help organize (from
1980 to 1990) - with equal time for discussion as the overall time for
presenters (that, by the way, presented professional experiences). So it was a
50: 50 division…
To put this in the same format of the Conference Peggy mentioned (18+42+30), my
time distribution should be: 15+15+15+45. That is, per 1,5h session, 3 speakers
with 15 minutes each, followed by a "dialog session" of 45 minutes.
And this was in 1980!
Artur
>>>
________________________________
From: Artur Silva <arturfsi...@yahoo.com>
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 11:48 AM
Subject: [OSList] Can any professional (engineer, architect, doctor) be
*certified*? (was Re: Certification?)
Chris:
You were very clear stating that an OST facilitator, or any other
facilitator, can't be certified, because "We are people
whose skill is in responding well to myriad and changing contexts". But you
made an exception to "engineers,
architects or doctors" that, if I understood well, can be certified (my
highlights
below). And they are probably certified by Universities and/or by professional
associations, I presume...
But the point is that engineers, architects and doctors are also peoplewhose
skill is in responding well to myriad and changing
contexts...
Haven't you ever find a doctor that
was not skilled enough to handle well a particular situation? I have find many
and in many different countries.
My professional case is very unusual but taught me a lot.
There were no courses on computer software at the time I was a student. So I
have studied electrical engineering and then I have joined IBM as a Systems
Engineer trainee. And they managed to (trans)form me in a computer SE by a
practical way in 1,5 years, the last 9 months being the inclusion of me as a
trainee in a real project, with very good and experienced professionals. I have
learnt more in those 9 months, than in 5 years at the University (I am not
saying that the University was not important to give me some theoretical basis).
Later I have continued to learn in a larger community of practice organized
around 6 professional Congresses, that I have proposed and help organize (from
1980 to 1990) - with equal time for discussion as the overall time for
presenters (that by the way, presented professional experiences). So it was a
50: 50 division…
Still later, as a
Professor (a very unorthodox one, as I think of myself as a "facilitator of
learning" and not as a "knowledge transmitter"), I have noticed
that some students learn a lot during the course and others not, but still
conclude the course. But employers tell me that, in both cases, new engineers
will normally spend at least one year being formed in the practicalities of the
profession (and the products they will use).
Also doctors have years of professional practice before
they become skilled enough to practice unsupervised.
So, can and University, or a Professional association, certify a doctor,
an engineer, an architect? I doubt.
Who can certify that they are competent or not are the
customers (when they don't die in the process) – so, the crowd, or, as they
say, the “market”...
Regards
Artur
________________________________
From: Chris Corrigan <ch...@chriscorrigan.com>
To: World wide Open Space Technology email list
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OSList] Certification?
Ohh I love this topic too, because as we go on and on it becomes clearer and
clearer to me that Harrison's original idea (which predated Open Source) was
sheer genius. There is an expression in english: "Closing the barn doors after
the horse has left." It's too late to certify people in Open Space Technology,
and thank God!
You simply cannot certify people as a way to protect the brand and the reason
is simple.
Certification is based on an industrial quality assurance model In other
words, every product leaving the factory is guaranteed to work the way we say
it is going to work. If it doesn't you can have your money back and we'll give
you a new one that works. Every product can be tested before it leaves the
factory to be sure it works reliably,
You simply cannot do that with facilitators. No amount of certification will
guarantee that a client will get what they want every single time. And a
facilitator taking a single training in Open Space or some other method will by
definition NOT be perfect leaving the factory. You need to develop a practice,
and even still there are contexts and situations that will challenge and
surprise you. "Be Prepared to Be Surprised" is the only certification I can
reliably give to anyone that has trained with me. We are not engineers,
architects or doctors. We are people whose skill is in responding well to
myriad and changing contexts.
The International Association of Facilitators went down this route. I have
seen some horrible facilitation done by people who are certified by the IAF.
So much so that I have no faith in that certification as standing for anything.
It is a worthy idea but it simply cannot be implemented.
>
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
