You have persuaded me that the 'two way street' is better for responsible traffic control, Michael. :-)
It takes guts to do that kind of thing. So power to those who are willing to be vulnerable to the unknown. I am really enjoying the information on Fran Peavey. The Ganges story could translate in many places. I am working in Kenya at the moment and no one has the ‘space' to speak about the terrible corruption and how to stop it, which goes to driving licences and baggage handling at the airport. There are many worthy initiatives and each is good and makes a difference. Critical mass and courage in the face of very real threats to personal safety are building. We/they need to open more space like this. A > On 26 Mar 2015, at 17:04, Michael Herman via OSList > <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote: > > i think the free speech part is important, amanda, at least in the U.S. where > we've made such a big deal about it for so long. it might be our most basic > right, a proxy for all our other rights. and yet it doesn't work unless > somebody's also listening. responsibility. it seems important to be able to > do these things together, in small flash groups like lucas has been doing and > also to make it a signal that has application and implications for the > largest political conversations. one of the steele election reforms, for > instance, is ending gerrymandering, the practice of cobbling together > sprawling election districts where (and so that) speech can go on without > listening. > > it's exciting, at the moment, to have lucas' experiment running alongside > daniel's experiment, too. > > > > > > -- > > Michael Herman > Michael Herman Associates > 312-280-7838 (mobile) > > http://MichaelHerman.com <http://michaelherman.com/> > http://OpenSpaceWorld.org <http://openspaceworld.org/> > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:47 AM, facilit8 - Amanda Bucklow > <ama...@facilit8.com <mailto:ama...@facilit8.com>> wrote: > This is so exciting! I don’t know quite why is should be so exciting but it > is for me. I am with you Michael on all your points. I might even be tempted > to drop the ‘free speech’ part and just go with ‘free listening’ although I > like the 'two way street’. > > Thanks for the note about Fran Peavey - I will look her up and the bits on > your web site. > > warm wishes > Amanda > > > >> On 26 Mar 2015, at 16:25, Michael Herman <mich...@michaelherman.com >> <mailto:mich...@michaelherman.com>> wrote: >> >> AWESOME! >> >> and a few thoughts to mix in... >> >> 1. if you haven't seen or heard of her, lucas, you might have a look for >> fran peavey. the gist of her story is that at a higher point of cold war >> tension and nuclear worries, she sold her house and stuff, bought a plane >> ticket, and packed a bit of old sheet with "American willing to listen" >> written on it in marker. I think she went first to Japan, and started a >> practice of sitting on benches and other public places with her sign laid >> out next to her. And then just waiting. This developed into something she >> called "strategic questioning." It seems her old website has disappeared, >> but a while back i captured some favorite bits of it at >> http://www.michaelherman.com/cgi/wiki.cgi?StrategicQuestions >> <http://www.michaelherman.com/cgi/wiki.cgi?StrategicQuestions> >> >> 2. i'm sure there are any number of ways to add rules and guidance and >> structure to what you've done, as you've wondered here. i'd say resist the >> temptation. years ago i was sitting in a circle in racine wisconsin, one >> big circle of 40 folks, talking about the future of their city and how to >> organize things in support. things got a little tense, scraped the wall in >> spots, shall we say, but i sat and did nothing, witnessing, holding, >> trusting, i suppose. when i shared the story with harrison, he said >> something like, "well, you've earned your stripes and your pay." this seems >> like one of those moments to be fully present and do as little, signal as >> little as possible. >> >> 3. that said, you already have made signs, so i'm going to say that's part >> of the practice, already. you already used the words "free speech." i said >> don't add anything and now i want to suggest adding just a very little bit >> to that and wonder if that won't be enough guidance on the micro >> as-its-happening level AND the macro social change level. my thought is >> that the signs might say "free speech / free listening" make it look like a >> street/traffic sign, play with making the free listening part in a font >> style that is an outline of the letters. add a verb if you must. whatever >> and as little as you can. but i think the combination of free speech/free >> listening might turn out to be some very robust and portable guidance. >> >> thank you! m >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Michael Herman >> Michael Herman Associates >> 312-280-7838 <tel:312-280-7838> (mobile) >> >> http://MichaelHerman.com <http://michaelherman.com/> >> http://OpenSpaceWorld.org <http://openspaceworld.org/> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Amanda Bucklow via OSList >> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org <mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>> >> wrote: >> This is just bloomin' fantastic and open space! >> >> Outrageously wonderful! Well done and do keep us posted on the developments. >> >> Warm wishes >> Amanda >> >> Amanda Bucklow >> Independent Commercial Mediator >> http://www.amandabucklow.co.uk <http://www.amandabucklow.co.uk/> >> >> On 26 Mar 2015, at 14:29, Lucas Cioffi via OSList >> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org <mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> This is cross-posted on the NCDD listserv, and I'm sharing it with the OS >>> List, because-- even though it's not about OST-- it's about opening space, >>> and I welcome your thoughts! >>> >>> I was partially inspired by Michael Herman's quote from four days ago: >>> "the other thing i do is never set out big circles in the breakout spaces. >>> i set three chairs to mark each breakout space, with more chairs piled to >>> the sides. the three chairs are pushed right together close, their front >>> edges forming a closed triangle. set this way, they are impossible to use. >>> the first person has to move them to whatever distance feels right to >>> them. after three people come, everyone needs to move them to make room >>> for others. in this way, i dictate nothing. they literally open the space >>> at the center of each breakout group. i've done it this way every time >>> since my first time, when i set big chairs and watched some small groups >>> squirm in spaces that were too big for them." >>> >>> I happen to live in Charlottesville, Virginia where a recent violent arrest >>> of a student and race-related protests have gotten some national media >>> attention. Over the past two days I tried an experiment in creating pop-up >>> civic space for dialogue. >>> >>> This is designed as an alternative to how Starbucks conducted its Race >>> Together initiative last week which has had mixed reviews. I wrote up my >>> thoughts below and attached some photos so you can get a feel for the >>> experience. >>> >>> My goals were to "bring dialogue to people" and to create a simple, >>> repeatable process that others might improve or replicate, even without >>> resources. >>> >>> This is not to detract from formal and well-resourced dialogue programs. I >>> believe there is also a vital need for public dialogue in the margins like >>> this when no resources are available. >>> >>> I'm wondering what your thoughts and suggestions are for improvement. >>> -- >>> Lucas Cioffi >>> Co-Founder, QiqoChat >>> Charlottesville, VA >>> 917-528-1831 <tel:917-528-1831> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Note: The article and full size photos are here: >>> http://americantownhalls.org <http://americantownhalls.org/> >>> >>> The American Townhall on Anything >>> Over the past few years, I've worked with a few volunteers to experiment >>> with different methods for having productive discussions on difficult >>> topics like politics. >>> Our current effort is The American Townhall on Anything, a playful yet >>> important opportunity to connect with fellow Americans for meaningful >>> conversation. >>> >>> The goal for this experiment is to create "pop-up civic space" where people >>> can have productive political discussions. This effort is similar to open >>> source software; no one owns it, and anyone can build on it and modify it >>> to make it work for their community. >>> >>> There is no official organization making this happen. These are just ideas >>> that we hope will catch on, evolve, and adapt as they grow to have greater >>> impact. >>> >>> You are invited to take these ideas, improve them, and build on them. >>> Here's what we've learned so far: >>> >>> Day 1, March 24th >>> >>> With my dad visiting from out of town, I wanted to have some fun, meet some >>> people, and help him get the feel for the community. I've been thinking >>> about doing something like this for a few weeks now, and (finally!) I had >>> someone who would sit there with me so I don't look so alone. Thanks, Pops! >>> >>> We took my four dining room chairs and walked them over to >>> Charlottesville's charming Downtown Pedestrian Mall. With some paper and >>> tape I put some signs on the back of the chairs such as the one you can >>> read above. >>> >>> Using indoor dining room chairs wasn't intentional (I didn't have any other >>> chairs), however they probably helped to catch people's attention because >>> they were both unusual and inviting. >>> >>> My father and I just started talking about topics that were important to >>> us. We had two open seats and people would read the signs and drop in to >>> join us for some conversation from time to time. >>> >>> Over the course of two hours, we met all types of great folks with >>> interesting stories to share. We talked about the weather. We talked >>> about race, religion, politics, and power. We connected in some surprising >>> and rewarding ways. >>> >>> One person walking by asked an intriguing question with a warm smile: "Is >>> this performance art?" My answer: "I don't know." Perhaps it is, or >>> perhaps it should be. I have to think about that. >>> >>> Day 2, March 25th >>> >>> On Day 2, I wanted to kick it up a notch. I wanted to bring our traveling >>> road show to the grounds of the University of Virginia where there has been >>> significant racial tension over the past week due to an arrest outside a >>> bar. >>> >>> We didn't go there to talk about any specific topic. We wanted to just >>> "open some space" and see what people wanted to talk about. This was an >>> experiment to test how students and university staff would react to an >>> opportunity to exercise their right to free speech. >>> >>> I was anxious, because I didn't know how this would be received. After >>> all, these are strangers sitting down to have some potentially difficult >>> conversations. I didn't want to create a space where someone would feel >>> uncomfortable, misunderstood, or disrespected. Fortunately everyone felt >>> comfortable, and we had some great conversations. >>> >>> We didn't state any ground rules. People simply defaulted to being humane. >>> Perhaps there should be ground rules. I don't know. >>> >>> On this second day, we were more effective in communicating what was >>> happening; we posted small paper signs 50 feet out in both directions along >>> the main walking path so that people had more time to understand what was >>> going on and that that they were absolutely invited to join the >>> conversation. Our simple handwritten signs were in color and said "FREE >>> SPEECH - Talk about anything." >>> >>> >>> Sometimes when people would walk by, we would ask them jokingly, "Are you >>> here for the free speech?" People got a laugh out of that. >>> >>> Students were curious. The chairs filled up quickly. Several other >>> students took photographs and we heard some very positive comments as >>> people were passing by: "Great idea!" and "I'm headed to class, but how >>> long are you hear today?" and "Are you going to be here tomorrow too?" >>> >>> After 30 minutes, it started raining, so we packed up and went home. All >>> in all, we were able to quickly validate our hypothesis that people would >>> be receptive to this type of experiment on a college campus. >>> >>> I wanted to see whether the students would move the discussion to some >>> difficult topics on their own, but the rain cut us short. Given what I saw >>> today and given my experience participating in a formal >>> student-faculty-community dialogue programs at UVA last year, I expect all >>> participants would have dealt with difficult topics in a respectful and >>> productive way if they came up. >>> >>> Next Steps >>> >>> This was energizing and fun, and I'm not quite sure what happens next. >>> >>> I'm active in some online communities of dialogue facilitators, so I'm >>> going to share this story with some friends in the National Coalition for >>> Dialogue and Deliberation and elsewhere to see what they think. >>> >>> Given that the new Starbucks "Race Together" dialogue initiative has had >>> mixed results (many people did not want dialogue forced upon them), I'd >>> also like to (delicately) try a modified version of this inside experiment >>> a Starbucks. >>> >>> If I try something in a Starbucks over the next few days, it will be very >>> different-- it would be just a sign-- a silent invitation-- and people can >>> choose to sit down and join the conversation if they'd like. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Where do we go from here? Well, if I/you/we can create a simple, repeatable >>> process for opening "pop-up civic space" like this, then others might do >>> the same, and we might all surprise ourselves with what is possible. There >>> is certainly a need for more productive dialogue in our country. >>> >>> Please do get in touch: he...@americantownhalls.org >>> <mailto:he...@americantownhalls.org> >>> <Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.50.09 AM.png> >>> <Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.50.34 AM.png> >>> <Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.50.41 AM.png> >>> <Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.50.51 AM.png> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSList mailing list >>> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >>> <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >>> <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org> >>> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >>> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org >>> <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> >>> Past archives can be viewed here: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org >>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSList mailing list >> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org >> <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org> >> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org >> <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org> >> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: >> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org >> <http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org> >> Past archives can be viewed here: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org >> <http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
_______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
