Thank you so much for coming back on this Christine :-)

Hege
7. juli 2015 kl. 23:33 skrev Marie Ann Östlund via OSList 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>:

> Thank you Christine, that was a brilliant learning! Inspiring. 
> 
> Marie Ann 
> 
> tisdag 7 juli 2015 skrev Catherine Pfaehler via OSList 
> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>:
> Ah, Christine, c’est trop beau – merci de l’avoir partagé!
> 
>  
> 
> Meilleures salutations de Berne (très chaud aussi…), Catherine
> 
>  
> 
> Catherine Pfaehler
> 
> Burckhardtstrasse 2
> 
> CH - 3008 Bern
> 
> +41-(0)31-536 05 31
> 
>  
> 
> Von: Suzanne Daigle via OSList [mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juli 2015 04:29
> An: Christine; World wide Open Space Technology email list
> Betreff: Re: [OSList] urgent need of your wisdom : how to reassure a 
> political guy who fears that the OST format will not be inclusive enough ?
> 
>  
> 
> Christine.... You rock. Thanks for posting! Thanks for sharing!
> Suzanne
> 
> On Jul 5, 2015 9:11 AM, "christine koehler via OSList" 
> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Martin, Harrison, Lisa
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you very much for your answers. It helped !
> 
>  
> 
> I had the call with the guy, and we had a long conversation together. We talk 
> about the range of outcomes he wished for. Having Harrison's voice in mind I 
> told him that to my knowledge, there was no other way to have 90 people 
> engage in 3 hours with the ability to act together soon and keep connected on 
> the long run in spite of divergent interests.  he insisted on having 2  guys 
> presenting briefly before I explained how it worked. We ended up with the 
> agreement of  5 people supposed to speak 5 mn  each, including himself.
> 
>  
> 
> Of course they spoke 10 mn each, so I shortened the opening keeping it to a 
> minimum.
> 
> It was obvious that the sponsor was doubtful and his glances at me - and his 
> team- were  quite cold. But he played the game. 
> 
> And guess what... of course it worked !
> 
>  
> 
> There were 30 sessions and about 20 action plans.
> 
> In spite of heat wave (and no chairs for breakout sessions , because of  no 
> chairs allowed in the huge hall...), people didn't leave during breaks, and 
> obviously were not in a hurry to leave after the closing... Everybody was 
> very happy.  
> 
> During closing circle, all standing,  the sponsor admitted he was very 
> doubtful, then added quietly" today I learned a lesson about participative 
> democracy". Another guy said he was used to open space, and that this one was 
> very convivial.
> 
>  
> 
> :)
> 
>  
> 
> I'm glad I know how to breathe.
> 
>  
> 
> Lisa, you asked me why I am asking when I know the answers. Precisely for 
> these reasons. Knowing that there are other people somewhere that are as 
> crazy as I am and do believe the same,  help me breathe and open the space 
> the best I can. 
> 
>  
> 
> Christine 
> 
>  
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Lisa Heft - <lisah...@openingspace.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Christine - 
> 
>  
> 
> Several things come to mind. And I know you already had your phone 
> appointment. And I am wondering what you sensed and did and what happened. 
> But still I will share reflections if it helps in general or as you reflect.
> 
>  
> 
> 1) What does your intuition / gut / sensing say? I imagine you know your own 
> answer. Is there a reason you hesitate when you can feel inside exactly what 
> to do and say?
> 
>  
> 
> 2) I agree that it sounds like OST is a good approach if the issue is complex 
> such as this. However there are huge power dynamics operating as well, right? 
> So these next things come to mind:
> 
>  
> 
> - if the sponsor 
> 
> fear that there it will not enough reflect the diversity of actions and 
> timeframe  and the possibility to create a kind of frame to support long term 
> action on the territory.
> 
>  — then her/his intuition may be speaking loudly, not just her/his fear, no? 
> If this all is so, does that not tell you both that it is more important to 
> take more time to plan (rather than the rushed planning) and find a longer 
> meeting time on another date? if it is so important?
> 
>  
> 
> And SO many things support long-term action. Not a single short event by 
> itself. Instead, relationships, infrastructure, time, ability, resources, 
> partners, champions, desks and computers, ability to step outside one’s daily 
> tasks to add in these tasks, SO many things. Are these in place before the 
> event to support the actions that are being invited? If not, is asking for 
> action appropriate for this particular event? Or is this for part of that 
> strength, such as in ideas, relationships, and so on ? Does all that have to 
> be accomplished by one short event? And if it is complex, why so short? 
> 
>  
> 
> 3) I always go with what is realistically achievable, given the circumstances 
> which I may or may not be able to inform.
> 
>  
> 
> - Without knowing more details, dynamics, ideas and emotions brought up 
> during your pre-work conversations, I can only say that as an outsider to 
> this my own intuition / gut / body says to take advantage of what a short OS 
> meeting can =realistically= deliver - which is a highlighting of emergent 
> issues, ability for people to notice who else cares about these things, ideas 
> generated for opportunities and for describing challenges, and that’s about 
> it.  With a documentation design that really captures, with another event 
> scheduled after people can rest and reflect on their documentation (data), 
> then going into the next step of mapping out (or even a small group having a 
> conversation about) what are resources / relationships / realities for what 
> in their systems can support actions, then inviting people who are really the 
> people who have power-mobility-ability-relationship to identify and work on 
> some actions, and so on and so on in a chain of meetings and conversations. 
> Not just a quickie because (do I understand you correctly?) there was some 
> meeting time within a COP21 event.
> 
>  
> 
> - Also with these power dynamics I would pay attention to other things that 
> can help as in: no introductions, no speeches, name tags only saying names 
> (not organizations or titles), and maybe even more of an emphasis in the 
> theme question on “I” to bring it into peoples’ bodies (mixed dynamics here 
> can often bring in tension and words of ‘somebody should’) - things like that.
> 
>  
> 
> Lastly, you asked what we did in a similar situation. I spoke to truth. 
> Always. “This will not work if you do x.” “If you want to do x, I can support 
> that by changing the process to do y but the Open Space process will not work 
> if you do that.” “Are you worried about x.” “You know that will not fix x” 
> “Then we need more time for inviting diverse people.” “Then we need more 
> hours in the meeting to embrace that tension and possibility.” “That 
> deliverable cannot be delivered in that short a time frame.” “Then we must 
> change the objective / theme / goal.” “Then we must schedule additional 
> meetings to accomplish each of these tasks over time.” “You know that that 
> does not support sustainability - you have seen it before, I am sure.” And so 
> on. 
> 
>  
> 
> He is such a busy man, you say. If so, it is essential to help him use his 
> (and others’) time wisely and productively. Right? That is what you do, when 
> you do your best, Christine…
> 
>  
> 
> No doubt some of us may be sharing thoughts and experiences about these sorts 
> of things when we gather for the Open Space Learning Workshop in Krakow 
> September 8-10, and also during the WOSonOS on September 10-13.  I SO look 
> forward to that...
> 
>  
> 
> Lisa
> 
>  
> 
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 11:32 AM, christine koehler via OSList 
> <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> of course, the way I put it sounds rather comic..
> 
>  
> 
> I am supposed to facilitated a 3h 1/2 OST next wednesday with 90 participants 
> from a very diverse background (impact of local actions on climate change and 
> COP21  -in Paris next fall- and they are all local actors : politics, 
> technicians, companies, non-profit etc.. Host is the territorial entity via a 
>  statesman with a territoral mandate. 
> 
> All has been organized in a few days, we have considered many different 
> design to come back to OST because of simplicity and efficiency .
> 
> But now the sponsor fear that there it will not enough reflect the diversity 
> of actions and timeframe  and the possibility to create a kind of frame to 
> support long term action on the territory.
> 
> Diificulty lies in the goal : for the planning team, immediate need is the 
> use of the space that the entity is willing to rent (and pay for) during 
> COP21 BUT that has to be run collectively (and not as usual here « we do it 
> for you ») , for the politics, the goal is « long" term with something that 
> will be created and will last even after the COP21 event.
> 
>  
> 
> I believe that OST s the only way that may reach all those goals in such a 
> short time frame (at least set the first step) but obviously there is no 
> control enough for him and now he want a few discourses speeches from a 
> variety of actors before opening the space so that everyone knows about all 
> this and that…
> 
>  
> 
> What would help me is what you did in similar situation.. because I don’t 
> know what to tell him (« trust the process obviously does not work…) My 
> appointment (by phone of course, such a busy man) with him is in a few hours
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Christine 
> 
> --
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> --
> 
> 
>  Executive Coach, Médiateur
>  www.christine-koehler.fr
>  Tel :  06 13 28 71 38
>   Fax :    09  72  32 36  65
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> Past archives can be viewed here: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
> 
> 
> 
>       
> Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. 
> www.avast.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> Past archives can be viewed here: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
> _______________________________________________
> OSList mailing list
> To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
> To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
> http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
> Past archives can be viewed here: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

Reply via email to