I don't think so (but I'm not sure). That way you highlighted is a 'via' member, and it is indeed the same in both relations, but the 'from' members are different, so there should be no ambiguity. There would be no problem if the 'via' segment were collapsed to a single point.
On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 at 17:26:54 UTC+1 CP wrote: > > > Op 27-10-2020 om 15:35 schreef Davide F: > > I recently added to OSM a turn restriction relation ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11790375) which has two ways, > instead of a single point, as 'via' members. This usage is documented on > OSMWiki, so I didn't make anything up, however OsmAnd seems to ignore this > relation while calculating the route. Do you know if this is supported by > the app? > > > Caveat emptor: I'm no hero with turn restrictions. > > If I look at that little piece of main road... > > > > ... and then in the OSM edit page at the bottom left, you will see that > there's both a restriction "Only straight on" straight onward *and* a > restriction "Only straight on" to the right. So I think they're cancelling > each other out. Could that be the problem? > > CP > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/a320040a-2cbb-4f34-af2c-05c3d0f905d7n%40googlegroups.com.
