Hi, 

I’d like to start a 2 week OSPF WG adoption poll of the subject draft. The 
encodings are very close to those in the OSPFv2 draft (which is a WG document) 
other than the fact that they take advantage of the OSPFv3 LSA extensions which 
simplifies things. However, it makes a lot of sense to advance these drafts 
separately since the OSPFv2 draft is not dependent on any other drafts and 
there are existing implementations. 

Thanks,
Acee

On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Peter, 
> I will review this version and start the adoption poll. 
> 
> Others - please read and comment. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Acee
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Acee, WG,
>> 
>> I have updated the OSPFv3 SR extension draft.
>> 
>> Given that OSPFv2 SR extension draft has been accepted as a WG item, it 
>> would make a lot of sense to make the OSPFv3 SR draft WG document as well.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Peter
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:47:17 -0700
>> From: <[email protected]>
>> To: Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura 
>> <[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>, 
>> "Rob Shakir" <[email protected]>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>, "Wim 
>> Henderickx" <[email protected]>, Clarence Filsfils 
>> <[email protected]>, Wim Henderickx <[email protected]>, 
>> Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, 
>> Clarence Filsfils <[email protected]>, Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, 
>> "Rob Shakir" <[email protected]>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, 
>> draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Peter Psenak and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:                draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension
>> Revision:    02
>> Title:               OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing
>> Document date:       2014-07-02
>> Group:               Individual Submission
>> Pages:               29
>> URL: 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>> Status: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension/
>> Htmlized: 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>> Diff: 
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
>>  paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
>>  topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
>>  advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).
>> 
>>  This draft describes the necessary OSPFv3 extensions that need to be
>>  introduced for Segment Routing.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> .
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to