support as co-author.

s.


On Jul 3, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> I’d like to start a 2 week OSPF WG adoption poll of the subject draft. The 
> encodings are very close to those in the OSPFv2 draft (which is a WG 
> document) other than the fact that they take advantage of the OSPFv3 LSA 
> extensions which simplifies things. However, it makes a lot of sense to 
> advance these drafts separately since the OSPFv2 draft is not dependent on 
> any other drafts and there are existing implementations. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Peter, 
>> I will review this version and start the adoption poll. 
>> 
>> Others - please read and comment. 
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Acee
>> On Jul 2, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Acee, WG,
>>> 
>>> I have updated the OSPFv3 SR extension draft.
>>> 
>>> Given that OSPFv2 SR extension draft has been accepted as a WG item, it 
>>> would make a lot of sense to make the OSPFv3 SR draft WG document as well.
>>> 
>>> thanks,
>>> Peter
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>>> draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:47:17 -0700
>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>> To: Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura 
>>> <[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]>, 
>>> "Rob Shakir" <[email protected]>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>, "Wim 
>>> Henderickx" <[email protected]>, Clarence Filsfils 
>>> <[email protected]>, Wim Henderickx <[email protected]>, 
>>> Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, 
>>> Clarence Filsfils <[email protected]>, Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, 
>>> "Rob Shakir" <[email protected]>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new version of I-D, 
>>> draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> has been successfully submitted by Peter Psenak and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>> 
>>> Name:               draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension
>>> Revision:   02
>>> Title:              OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing
>>> Document date:      2014-07-02
>>> Group:              Individual Submission
>>> Pages:              29
>>> URL: 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt
>>> Status: 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension/
>>> Htmlized: 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>>> Diff: 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02
>>> 
>>> Abstract:
>>> Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
>>> paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
>>> topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
>>> advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF).
>>> 
>>> This draft describes the necessary OSPFv3 extensions that need to be
>>> introduced for Segment Routing.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>> 
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>> 
>>> .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to