Hi Helen,
As an author, I would certainly support this work. I think it is clearly
in the OSPF WG¹s best interest to facilitate migration to a single
version. When that happens will be dependent on numerous factors including
requirements, deployments, and how well we facilitate it.
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/22/14, 8:53 PM, "Ing-Wher Chen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I'd like to ask if the working group would adopt and help improve and
>refine
>the following draft:
>
><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/>
>
>This document describes a mechanism to transport OSPfv3 over IPv4.
>The mechanism allows devices to migrate to OSPFv3 first, which would help
>with transition to IPv6 later.
>
>The latest -01 version addresses an earlier question by including
>an IPv4-only use case in which deployed devices cannot communicate
>in IPv6 but would benefit from using the mechanism proposed in this draft
>to transition to OSPFv3 for now.  Until all devices can communicate using
>IPv6,
>consolidating to OSPFv3 can still reduce operational complexity and cost.
>
>Thanks,
>Helen
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to