I read the draft and support its adoption. Jeffrey
> -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:39 PM > To: Ing-Wher Chen; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3? > > Hi Helen, > As an author, I would certainly support this work. I think it is clearly > in the OSPF WG¹s best interest to facilitate migration to a single > version. When that happens will be dependent on numerous factors > including > requirements, deployments, and how well we facilitate it. > Thanks, > Acee > > On 7/22/14, 8:53 PM, "Ing-Wher Chen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I'd like to ask if the working group would adopt and help improve and > >refine > >the following draft: > > > ><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/> > > > >This document describes a mechanism to transport OSPfv3 over IPv4. > >The mechanism allows devices to migrate to OSPFv3 first, which would > help > >with transition to IPv6 later. > > > >The latest -01 version addresses an earlier question by including > >an IPv4-only use case in which deployed devices cannot communicate > >in IPv6 but would benefit from using the mechanism proposed in this > draft > >to transition to OSPFv3 for now. Until all devices can communicate > using > >IPv6, > >consolidating to OSPFv3 can still reduce operational complexity and > cost. > > > >Thanks, > >Helen > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >OSPF mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
