Hi Eric,
there are definitely deployments using OSPF as PE-CE. It's typically
used for enterprise customers, that use OSPF as their IGP and use L3 VPN
service to interconnect their sites.
thanks,
Peter
On 10/8/14 17:45 , Osborne, Eric wrote:
I'm not sure this has much value. The vast majority of dynamic PE-CE is done
with BGP; the little bit that isn't BGP is, in my experience, RIP. I don't
think I've seen many (any?) OSPF PE-CE deployments.
eric
-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Youjianjie
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 10:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSPF] 转发: New Version Notification for
draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
Hi all,
This document discusses the use cases that OSPF is used to distribute FlowSpec
routes. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link State
Advertisement (LSA) encoding format.
Your comments are appreciated.
Best Regards,
Jianjie
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2014年9月28日 10:32
收件人: Youjianjie; Youjianjie; liuweihang; liuweihang
主题: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF
repository.
Name: draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions
Revision: 01
Title: OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification
Document date: 2014-09-27
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 11
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions/
Htmlized:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
Diff:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
Abstract:
This document discusses the use cases why OSPF (Open Shortest Path
First) distributing flow specification (FlowSpec) routes is
necessary. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque
Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to
distribute FlowSpec routes.
For the network only deploying IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) (e.g.
OSPF), it is expected to extend IGP to distribute FlowSpec routes.
One advantage is to mitigate the impacts of Denial-of-Service (DoS)
attacks.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
