On 03/11/2014 14:20, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
ready for a WG adoption poll.
Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
Document.
Regards,
-Abhay
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
A comment that I made over on the MPLS list.
I am not convinced that MRT has the degree of maturity that we would
normally
require for a routing protocol intended for deployment as part of a major
IGP. This is obviously a discussion that needs to happen in RTGWG.
I would therefore suggest that whilst the WG may adopt this component
draft, it needs to sequence publication behind a number of the main MRT
drafts and set the track accordingly.
- Stewart
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
