We will accept the OSPF MRT extensions as a WG document. Progression will parallel that of the base documents in the RTG WG. Thanks, Acee
On 11/3/14, 9:20 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote: >The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this >document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon >for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is >ready for a WG adoption poll. > >Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG >Document. > >Regards, >-Abhay > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
