Hi All, /Support
Authors, really interested in seeing more results from your test networks, things like: - Scalability of TTZ (network sizes) - Start-up time, average time to form relationships, etc. - Impact from link failures and convergence time - Operational findings/issues Your I-D contains already contains some high-level implementation details (Good Job!), but I suggest you report your existing/future findings as per RFC6982 (Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status Section). This would include some or all of the following information: - The organization responsible for the implementation, if any - The implementation's name and/or a link to a web page describing the implementation - A brief/general description - The implementation's level of maturity: research, prototype, alpha, beta, production, widely used, etc. - Coverage: which parts of the protocol specification are implemented and which versions of the Internet-Draft were implemented. - Licensing: the terms under which the implementation can be used. For example: proprietary, royalty licensing, freely distributable with acknowledgement (BSD style), freely distributable with requirement to redistribute source (General Public License (GPL) style), and other (specify) - Implementation experience: any useful information the implementers want to share with the community - Contact information: ideally a person's name and email address, but possibly just a URL or mailing list Finally, I would like to understand the applicability/impact when using OSPF-TE. I guess this will be a separate document though. BR, Dan. >We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their >colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is >consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is >disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide >significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment >dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as >an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG >adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015. > >For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft: > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt > >Thanks, >Acee and Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
