Hi Dan,
Thanks much for your support and comments! We will address them accordingly.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel King
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG poll for adoption
as experimental
Hi All,
/Support
Authors, really interested in seeing more results from your test networks,
things like:
- Scalability of TTZ (network sizes)
- Start-up time, average time to form relationships, etc.
- Impact from link failures and convergence time
- Operational findings/issues
Your I-D contains already contains some high-level implementation details (Good
Job!), but I suggest you report your existing/future findings as per
RFC6982 (Improving Awareness of Running Code: The Implementation Status
Section). This would include some or all of the following information:
- The organization responsible for the implementation, if any
- The implementation's name and/or a link to a web page describing the
implementation
- A brief/general description
- The implementation's level of maturity: research, prototype, alpha, beta,
production, widely used, etc.
- Coverage: which parts of the protocol specification are implemented and which
versions of the Internet-Draft were implemented.
- Licensing: the terms under which the implementation can be used. For
example: proprietary, royalty licensing, freely distributable with
acknowledgement (BSD style), freely distributable with requirement to
redistribute source (General Public License (GPL) style), and other
(specify)
- Implementation experience: any useful information the implementers want to
share with the community
- Contact information: ideally a person's name and email address, but possibly
just a URL or mailing list
Finally, I would like to understand the applicability/impact when using
OSPF-TE. I guess this will be a separate document though.
BR, Dan.
>We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their
>colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is
>consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is
>disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide
>significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment
>dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption
>as an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG
>adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.
>
>For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt
>
>Thanks,
>Acee and Abhay
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
