Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * There seems to be an difference between this document's definition of sub-TLVs (with 2 octet types and lengths) and those of RFC5512 (with 1 octet types and lengths). So I am surprised to see the document point to the RFC5512 based TLVs for both syntax and semantics (Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 ...) . Can you please explain how these sub-TLVs are encoded on the wire to be compatible with this draft? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * IANA considerations Looks like the value 65535 is included both as experimental and reserved. Suggest changing OLD: 65500-65535 Experimental This document NEW: 65500-65534 Experimental This document _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
