Suresh, Thanks for the review and comments. Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krish...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:50 AM > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * There seems to be an difference between this document's definition of > sub-TLVs (with 2 octet types and lengths) and those of RFC5512 (with 1 octet > types and lengths). So I am surprised to see the document point to the > RFC5512 > based TLVs for both syntax and semantics (Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 ...) . Can > you > please explain how these sub-TLVs are encoded on the wire to be compatible > with > this draft? [Bruno] Would the following change works for you? OLD: This Sub-TLV of type 2 is defined in Section 3.4.1 "Protocol Type sub-TLV" of <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps"/> from a syntactic, semantic, and usage standpoint. NEW: This Sub-TLV type is 2. The syntax, semantic, and usage of its value field is defined in Section 3.4.1 "Protocol Type sub-TLV" of <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps"/>. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * IANA considerations > > Looks like the value 65535 is included both as experimental and reserved. > Suggest changing > > OLD: > 65500-65535 Experimental This document > > NEW: > 65500-65534 Experimental This document > [Bruno] Good catch. Thanks for the careful review. Fixed as per you suggestion in -07 https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-07.txt --Bruno _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
