Hi Alia,
+1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-) Cheers, Jeff From: rtgwg <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22 To: <isis...@ietf.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org> Cc: RTGWG <rt...@ietf.org> Subject: early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG I am working on the initial charter for the LSR WG, which will combine the OSPF and ISIS WGs. At this time, I do not see moving the fast-reroute work from RTGWG, but I am willing to hear opinions. In general, feedback on what areas should be the initial focus or specific concerns on scoping would be useful. My basic plan is for a broad charter focused on maintenance, usage scenarios, and extensions - much as OSPF and ISIS are chartered today. I would like to have this on the February 8 IESG telechat, so rapid feedback and reviews of the proposed charter when it is sent out would be appreciated. Thanks, Alia _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rt...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
