+1
S
On 24/01/2018 23:27, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
Hi Alia,
+1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-)
Cheers,
Jeff
*From: *rtgwg <rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Alia Atlas
<akat...@gmail.com>
*Date: *Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22
*To: *<isis...@ietf.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
*Cc: *RTGWG <rt...@ietf.org>
*Subject: *early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG
I am working on the initial charter for the LSR WG, which will combine
the
OSPF and ISIS WGs. At this time, I do not see moving the fast-reroute
work
from RTGWG, but I am willing to hear opinions.
In general, feedback on what areas should be the initial focus or
specific
concerns on scoping would be useful. My basic plan is for a broad
charter focused
on maintenance, usage scenarios, and extensions - much as OSPF and
ISIS are
chartered today.
I would like to have this on the February 8 IESG telechat, so rapid
feedback and reviews
of the proposed charter when it is sent out would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alia
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list
rt...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
isis...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
