Hi Michal, The way we will use OSRM, we'll compute speed independently of OSRM a posteriori, using the height output. So we won't adapt anything regarding the bike speed (I suppose for that, it should be agreed upon a formula before...), but if you want to compute it e.g. on the client side with your own formula, it should be possible. (Yves, Stéphane, Radu correct me if I'm wrong ;)
Kind regards, Elisabeth On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Michal Palenik <michal.pale...@freemap.sk>wrote: > hello all > > I did not see it in your text, but use of elevation during calculation > of the route would increase possibilities for (at least) bicycle > routing. mainly change forward and backward speed according to meters > gained/descended (or changing impedance). > > is this also one of the goals? > > thanks > > michal > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:06:52PM +0100, Elisabeth Leu wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > This e-mail just to let you know that we decided to work on integrating > the > > elevation output in OSRM. > > > > The goal is to have elevation in the geometry of the output JSON as well > as > > in the GPX, and an option in OSRM to enable elevation (disabled by > default). > > > > We might ask questions about it in the next days / weeks, with the final > > goal to suggest this feature as a pull request for reviewing. > > > > We are open to take opinions and remarks about it, esp. concering a > future > > pull request for OSRM master/develop. > > > > Best regards, > > Radu, Yves, Stéphane and Elisabeth > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yves Bolognini < > > yves.bologn...@camptocamp.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > yves.bologn...@camptocamp.com');> > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Thanks for your answer. Actually yes, for now our need is simply to > > > show elevation in the output. > > > > > > I thought of using the way.name attribute to pass node elevations. > But: > > > 1) Elevation is on nodes, not on ways. So we would need to implement > > > some hack to pass both nodes' evelations on every way's name > > > 2) I thought maybe the profile thing in OSRM output would be > > > interesting for other devs, so it may be good to code it the clean way > > > > > > Anyone has an idea how hard it would be to add such a feature inside > > > OSRM? Is someone interested in this addition? > > > > > > Best, > > > Yves > > > > > > > > > 2014-01-30 Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > f...@zz.de');> > > > >: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:28:39PM +0100, Yves Bolognini wrote: > > > >> Hello List, > > > >> > > > >> We have elevation data in our source graph. Each vertex has > elevation > > > >> information ("ele" key in OSM-like data). We'd like to have this > info > > > >> in OSRM result in order to display profile. > > > > > > > > My understanding would be that you need to put this into some tag > OSRM > > > > stores the hsrm file and shows it in the JSON e.g. name. > > > > > > > > I do something like the following: > > > > > > > > if speed_profile[highway] ~= nil then > > > > way.speed=speed_profile[highway] > > > > way.name=table.concat({way.id,highway,way.name,way.ref},"|") > > > > end > > > > > > > > So i get way.id, highway type, name and ref ... > > > > > > > >> What are the chances that elevation data will be available one day > in > > > >> the output? > > > >> What do you estimate regarding the complexity to implement it? > > > >> Would a contribution for this feature be considered? > > > > > > > > From using elevation data i would expect to have elevation on nodes > > > > and if adjacent nodes have different elevation, you would need to > split > > > > the way and make it 2 oneways with different costs. > > > > > > > > Uphill more expensive than downhill. > > > > > > > > Or is it just you'd like to show elevation data in the output? > > > > > > > > Flo > > > > -- > > > > Florian Lohoff > f...@zz.de<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','f...@zz.de');> > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > > > > > > > iQIVAwUBUup2BJDdQSDLCfIvAQgJgA//VTwAdXc41GeJediOMp+nTkr3ztmfQ1Lx > > > > a1JETnmTbdrdUZsYqQZrGKpSDwCTAwOXx8Vu018dhIpNmSGhrH1Jn2qWTsazBmSQ > > > > r6T0a/vk/Ow8NXkZTR2vy66XBO/F4ZClYxWZm0O3J5p/cGPRgNyDZWsaCACAGdLf > > > > eJzv2UoCO9Mq27V2fzHwCEB1TBwQBy8a/heN1VJuIREkmWiLZTSIEpr8FkjjjWts > > > > o66Yna48jYqEWW0DYqC9v3hPvQb7suvT508zetTJeONiYXcHENfaD3orsBLkWCH2 > > > > 8qjKo3BJ0qWin92y9J3Su0Vf8+MWb/TQ55a6OqEzqWu696UkYn7pmkk/lbpZVMY3 > > > > DB1Pd84S1/lGLUmPJbG9sm/ouCJbkresTKvHfvHkPVZB0CiOEg/zpZOCzzziul5r > > > > 0iF2XloVGInhG6c6pbtn6lSpsnRe7ZfuOp9dbtWey5SXzmPqlt0D5J7/G/y8/Nqo > > > > 5z5zTqczEKRnh1oPoa5D1t9TTyKFngAEMa7jwoAxUQEuRpFOUPuI8zGJzc7doRgi > > > > GKrVGi6Dt42CFzlwvneKUrq0e+PqQvN8zMjJ0a4d3fPd9/a2zSyFCV7HtuoAgSXL > > > > XzMDjGnjJBJIoWDfQoW3hdIwmRP6txbf/qWKk5scSDYvD6C2KTnw7mWvGcdB5CTg > > > > cH6g7uCak70= > > > > =JgTX > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > OSRM-talk mailing list > > > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org');> > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Elisabeth Leu > > > > Camptocamp SA > > PSE A > > CH-1015 Lausanne > > www.camptocamp.com > > > > Phone: +41 21 619 10 21 > > > > > > -- > > Elisabeth Leu > > > > Camptocamp SA > > PSE A > > CH-1015 Lausanne > > www.camptocamp.com > > > > Phone: +41 21 619 10 21 > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSRM-talk mailing list > > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > > > -- > michal palenik > www.freemap.sk > www.oma.sk > -- Elisabeth Leu Camptocamp SA PSE A CH-1015 Lausanne www.camptocamp.com Phone: +41 21 619 10 21
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk